|
2009-11-21
, 22:14
|
Posts: 883 |
Thanked: 980 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Bern, Switzerland
|
#362
|
The other thing is with OS responsiveness which is a little more worrying. It seemed like pretty often I would 'click' an app/button (icon graphically indicating that it was clicked) but then the app would not launch/button wouldn't do anything. Anyone else running into this? I'm still getting used to the resistive screen (coming from "that other phone").
|
2009-11-21
, 23:09
|
Posts: 2,014 |
Thanked: 1,581 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#363
|
Mmmmm maybe Eldar was correct about the N900 being a little unstable aferall? Typical Nokia?
Or maybe you have a bad unit because none of the folks with the pre-release units ever mentioned stability issues...
|
2009-11-21
, 23:19
|
Posts: 288 |
Thanked: 196 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ London
|
#364
|
|
2009-11-21
, 23:35
|
Posts: 519 |
Thanked: 366 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ North Carolina (Formerly Denmark and Iceland)
|
#365
|
Did you have to blaspheme ? Very offended by your disregard for my faith.
|
2009-11-21
, 23:40
|
|
Posts: 279 |
Thanked: 208 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ London
|
#366
|
Did you have to blaspheme ? Very offended by your disregard for my faith.
|
2009-11-22
, 00:03
|
Posts: 2,014 |
Thanked: 1,581 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#367
|
Did you have to blaspheme ? Very offended by your disregard for my faith.
The Following User Says Thank You to Bratag For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-11-22
, 00:08
|
|
Posts: 569 |
Thanked: 159 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ District of Columbia
|
#368
|
|
2009-11-22
, 00:22
|
Posts: 2,014 |
Thanked: 1,581 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#369
|
What's up with " internet2.voicestream.com" someone mentioned this earlier, and I'm just wondering why I should change my settings to the internet2 instead of just keeping it on the internet[1]
|
2009-11-22
, 00:28
|
Posts: 13 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#370
|
In Linux, the same memory can be both cached files and memory in use by programs.
Memory in use by programs can be dropped from RAM if it isn't actively used, the same way as cached files are dropped from RAM.
So just adding up the total amount of memory mapped into programs doesn't give a good measure of how much RAM is actually being used by those programs.
What's more, a lot of the memory used in that way is shared among many programs. Calculating the contribution of a single program, in terms of how much memory would be freed if you killed that one but kept everything else running, is tricky. And even if you calculated that exactly, it's not necessary meaningful.
If you think that's unnecessarily complicated... well, it uses much less RAM that way than doing it the simple way :-)