Active Topics

 



Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 116 | Thanked: 75 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#381
I voted for both as well.
Trying to install it (via apt-get), I got an error message that said a package could not be authenticated, doing an "apt-get update" solved the problem and now I am very happy with conboy.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to andyfrommk For This Useful Post:
Posts: 344 | Thanked: 73 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Los Angeles
#382
There have been two updates, latest at 0.6.3.9 - since they do not seem to address the sync issues, I assume they are for something else?
 
Posts: 654 | Thanked: 664 times | Joined on Feb 2009 @ Germany
#383
Jup, as I said earlier, those are test builds as there have been some patches included by other people and we need to make sure that everything still builds on the maemo infrastructure. Also some tests have been done regarding those bugs posted earlier.

There will probably be more test builds during the next days. If I find time to actually implement real functionality (read sync), IŽll let you know right here
 
Posts: 344 | Thanked: 73 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Los Angeles
#384
Got it. Thx.
 
Posts: 344 | Thanked: 73 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Los Angeles
#385
FYI, I was just able to update/sync Conboy successfully, even though the same error occurred. Specifically, *to* Conboy only was updated. When I tried to sync new data *from* Conboy it crashed, and no changes to the server occurred.
 
Posts: 654 | Thanked: 664 times | Joined on Feb 2009 @ Germany
#386
yea, that crash is a result of the u1 servers not working. I have to check that error condition. The main problem now is that u1 returns a 500 server error. I hope they will fix that soon, otherwise I can't do developement over the weekend
 
Posts: 654 | Thanked: 664 times | Joined on Feb 2009 @ Germany
#387
Here is what the U1 web site is currently saying:
Notes, Contacts and Bookmarks
Our Notes, Contacts and Bookmarks database is not responding at the moment.
Don't worry. This is a temporary problem and your data is secure. We have been alerted of the issue and will resolve it promptly. You can also chat with us directly to get the latest information on the issue.
I've added a check, so the next version won't crash in that case and instead displays a dialog.
 
Posts: 65 | Thanked: 21 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#388
Great app. I'm enjoying it greatly -- particularly now that I have sync working with Ubuntu One and my Win7 box. But I have one puzzlement...

Under "Settings" there is a checkbox option labeled "XML Storage Backend". I've never seen anyone mention it here. I have looked at the raw data files and seen that they are XML or at least XML-like. So what would happen if I unchecked that box? It doesn't seem to make sense that the XML files would disappear or go unused. (Where would the data be then?)

And since it _is_ an option, what's the use case for UNselecting "XML Storage Backend"?
__________________
Just another perl hacker coding python in a bottle.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to dvergin For This Useful Post:
Posts: 344 | Thanked: 73 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Los Angeles
#389
Originally Posted by conny View Post
Here is what the U1 web site is currently saying:


I've added a check, so the next version won't crash in that case and instead displays a dialog.
The u1 servers appear to be up and running this morning. I was able to sync all my Tomboys.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to sorodoros For This Useful Post:
Posts: 654 | Thanked: 664 times | Joined on Feb 2009 @ Germany
#390
Originally Posted by dvergin View Post
Great app. I'm enjoying it greatly -- particularly now that I have sync working with Ubuntu One and my Win7 box. But I have one puzzlement...

Under "Settings" there is a checkbox option labeled "XML Storage Backend". I've never seen anyone mention it here. I have looked at the raw data files and seen that they are XML or at least XML-like. So what would happen if I unchecked that box? It doesn't seem to make sense that the XML files would disappear or go unused. (Where would the data be then?)

And since it _is_ an option, what's the use case for UNselecting "XML Storage Backend"?
Yea, that's a bit confusing and I should probably do something about it. If you install more plug-ins (there is currently only conboy-midgard) it will make more sense, because then you can choose which plug-ins should be activated. If, however, you only have the default plug-in (which is the XML backend) it dosn't make sens to deactivate it. If you deactivate it, Conboy is simply useless
I should probably implement, that if there is only one plug-in, then the selection should not be shown at all. I'll see what I can do.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to conny For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
conboy, grauphel


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:50.