|
2011-08-12
, 23:06
|
Banned |
Posts: 706 |
Thanked: 296 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#3912
|
|
2011-08-12
, 23:24
|
Posts: 241 |
Thanked: 324 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#3913
|
|
2011-08-12
, 23:25
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#3914
|
I think that N9 is a buggy device and cant compete in the good old USA market
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-08-12
, 23:27
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#3915
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-08-12
, 23:34
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#3916
|
Sorry, but I still can't agree with that logic.
If you don't buy a N9 (even if you like it) just to teach Nokia a lesson.
Then you are validating management's decisions.
Because as we all know... So many things they've done/planned.
Have directly/indirectly dramatically impacted N9's chances.
Anyway it comes down to if you like the device overall once the comparos are done.
That's when I'll make my final decision...
I'm not going to buy or not buy it purely as a political gesture.
The VKB is at worse average. That is not the issue. It's not being released in certain areas NOT because of the incompetence of the device (which we have not heard of mind you) but because Elop basically KILLED the thought of long term support with his statements.
So yeah why would the biggest smartphone markets wanna buy a device after Elop said things like
'Meego is experimental'
'Meego isn't ready, it won't be till 2013 so we went WP7'
'n9 is going to be the only meego device'
'we're cutting Meego expenditure DRASTICALLY, and shift most of our resources to make sure wp7 doesn't fail'
The kind of people who are frequenting the internet for news about new devices that haven't come out yet like the N9.
checked already, but your patronising tone is only showing your lack of intelligence in your bid to dispute a simple point. If Win 6.5 is atophying by which I assume you mean atrophying then they are buying other phones, not WP7. It's that simple, it's a marketshare, this is not a hard concept to understand.
But we haven't got at the core of why they are choosing alternate OS'. I would think there's two real factors at play:
- Lack of carrier support/support from salespeople within carrier stores
- Lack of new devices
Do either of those show great macromanagement on behalf of Microsoft? Not really. But they do mean that it's probably not really worth rating the sales data until Mango comes along with new devices in tow and bridges the service gap that currently exists between WP7 & its competitors. How was Android's first year again?
Honestly son the door is right there, if you want to walk through it at any time I won't laugh too hard.
No, that's the reason Symbian failed in the past. The reason it is still failing is because of the aged UI design and the "underpowering" of flagship devices (we all know this is because Symbian doesn't need a particularly speedy CPU to perform well, but the general public don't).
The board didn't "panic", they responded to a quick drop in marketshare in Q4 2010 that looked like it had no sign of stopping. They took stock of all their options and WP7 is where they arrived. You have no insight into their decision-making process and neither do I, so we can't say HOW they came to this conclusion. However I'm willing to bet they didn't just go Leon on the situation
WAKE UP
TIME TO DIE
Seriously, most people in the world have more common sense than you do. You should probably try and remember that.
|
2011-08-12
, 23:40
|
|
Posts: 887 |
Thanked: 2,444 times |
Joined on Jun 2011
|
#3917
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to catbus For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-08-12
, 23:41
|
|
Posts: 307 |
Thanked: 312 times |
Joined on Apr 2011
@ P.A.
|
#3918
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to scapegoat845 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-08-12
, 23:50
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#3919
|
|
2011-08-12
, 23:52
|
|
Posts: 194 |
Thanked: 172 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Sydney, Australia
|
#3920
|
Even if this is a re-write
you couldn't possibly compare that to the HTC G1's release on T-Mobile as being equatable?
The newest offering still manages to, so far, leave people unimpressed in a sea of competitors that Microsoft must now contend with.
Tags |
disapoint, eflop, epic win!, laggy interface, n9 rox, so much win, wateriswet, who cares, whyyyyy?????? |
|
Is because it wasn't given the majority of the focus/funding until far too late (approx Q1 2010 IIRC).
Symbian kept prosecuting the case for it's relevance (rightly or wrongly so) to Maemo's detriment.
Last edited by jalyst; 2011-08-12 at 22:56.