Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
krisse's Avatar
Posts: 1,540 | Thanked: 1,045 times | Joined on Feb 2007
#31
Originally Posted by Big Phat Jan View Post
I think it's undeniable that someone with a working knowledge of the command line can get things done much more quickly than someone without, ... The time you're talking about wasting is really negligible (imho).
:-O

Who was it that claimed this forum was suitable for ordinary users?


At the most a couple of days of actual use to get the basics. It'll pay you back in spades when you want to rename hundreds of files in a photo album (for example).
A couple of days of learning command line commands "negligible"?

You honestly truly think this is a realistic proposition for most end users?

This isn't a system administrators' convention here, we're talking about a consumer product aimed at ordinary people who aren't hobbyists.

They do not want to learn text-based commands entered at a prompt. It doesn't matter how much benefit they get from it, it is simply not something they would do.

They don't give a rat's arse about Maemo itself, they just want a cool gadget that does fun things and is easy to use. Command lines aren't cool, they're not fun, and they're not easy to use.

Last edited by krisse; 2009-12-04 at 03:14.
 
krisse's Avatar
Posts: 1,540 | Thanked: 1,045 times | Joined on Feb 2007
#32
Expecting users to spend a "couple of days learning the basics" of command lines is a major reason why more people don't use Linux. When I tell people the N900 runs Linux some of them seriously ask if it's only intended for programmers.

Linux will only become mainstream if it doesn't require any command line input from a typical user.

If the GUI is slower than command lines, that does not mean you can expect the user to learn command lines, it means you demand the GUI be improved in whatever way it is deficient. The GUI is the only game in town if you want Linux to be for more than just hobbyists.

Last edited by krisse; 2009-12-04 at 03:22.
 
ARJWright's Avatar
Posts: 861 | Thanked: 734 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ Nomadic
#33
Linux the platform might want to become mainstrean, but do the people that currenly make up its culture (stereotypical Linux user) want it to be mainstream, or (like in most groups) would they rather keep certain walls up so that the good folks come in, and those more alongside the stream's main path would rather keep away from?

Usually speaking, and in most cultures, the answer is "mainstream is good as long as we don't lose the quirks that keep us differentiated." Unfortunately, to become mainstream means to lose the differentiation of your quirks, and usually means a compromise on some quirks for the simpler good of being in common mind/actions with others.

In other words, teach noobs to use the terminal, and risk losing the quirk that keeps your community unique; and at same time, risk never growing the community and falling into irrelevance because of no growth because you weren't able to take a quirk and keep it from being a requirement.

Simple social science equasion to me
 
qole's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#34
ARJWright's comments reminded me that I am finding fewer and fewer reasons to go "back" to Windows. The easy addition of support for Nikon's raw photo format into Ubuntu has impressed the pants off of me. I actually had to boot into Linux to edit my raw photos!
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
 
Posts: 418 | Thanked: 174 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#35
Originally Posted by krisse View Post
This isn't a system administrators' convention here, we're talking about a consumer product aimed at ordinary people who aren't hobbyists.

They do not want to learn text-based commands entered at a prompt. It doesn't matter how much benefit they get from it, it is simply not something they would do.

They don't give a rat's arse about Maemo itself, they just want a cool gadget that does fun things and is easy to use. Command lines aren't cool, they're not fun, and they're not easy to use.
I've often found it to be easier to say what I feel, what I'm willing to do, what I see in a product - rather than speaking on the behalf of 'them'. They may not agree
__________________
I luv Google
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Tintin For This Useful Post:
phreck's Avatar
Posts: 176 | Thanked: 38 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ USA
#36
Originally Posted by MrGrim View Post
As can be expected, there has been a jump in the number of questions asked lately. Many were newbies asking various questions from the answerable-by-google kinds to the the inadvertently-expert type. And i have seen lots of "don't" advice posted in those threads.
Now, while i understand why it's bad to install apps from unsafe repos like extras-devel or go red-pill if you're not in the know, the danger of other things (like simply giving some commands in the terminal) is quite exaggerated. Many simply say "don't use the terminal if you're a noob". And i think they're pretty wrong.
I remember my first steps into linux. Gosh was i shaky. I had some experience with the awful windows command prompt, but everything was different under linux, so i wasn't very eager to use it. But i gradually got used to it. And most importantly, i understood that it's hard to do serious damage using just terminal commands. After the first time i killed my os (i think by changing something in the X configuration) and managed to reinstall everything the way it was quite easily, i was even more convinced.
Now think about them newbs. Maemo 5 is admittedly not perfectly user-friendly yet. Which means that you might not get full functionality if you don't get a little down-and-dirty. But the newbs are told not to do that, for fear of somehow doing some damage. What's even stranger is that sometimes they want to use something relatively harmless. And remember it's hard to do serious damage to linux without being root.
So my proposal is: let's give newbs some credit for being reasonably capable. Don't tell them off using terminal just because they don't have experience - they aren't going to get any either by not doing anything. Just warn when possibly damaging commands are involved (like rm - but don't go overboard, cat or grep can hardly be dangerous). And if something dangerous is involved, instead of recommending not to do it, warn about the danger and advise people to be ready to reflash if anything goes wrong - leaving them the choice of whether to do it or not
Sorry for the long text, hope you had the patience to read it

cute really.
its one thing to mess up your x11 config and be a noob.

its a completely different thing to brick a phone and be a noob.
__________________
How can we help you when you wont help yourself?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to phreck For This Useful Post:
ARJWright's Avatar
Posts: 861 | Thanked: 734 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ Nomadic
#37
Originally Posted by qole View Post
ARJWright's comments reminded me that I am finding fewer and fewer reasons to go "back" to Windows. The easy addition of support for Nikon's raw photo format into Ubuntu has impressed the pants off of me. I actually had to boot into Linux to edit my raw photos!
I feel that way about all larger (desktop) OSes. I used a Palm OS Treo as my only home computer until I went to using a N800/N75 combo (Maemo/Symbian) and currently use an N97 as my main and usually only unless I'm on a work/client provided WinXP laptop. I don't care for the mess that is the culture of many mainstream OSes, but I also understand that if everyone adopted my point of view, that I'd been looking for something else to be different with. Its really a backwards cat and mouse game when you think about it.
 
Posts: 102 | Thanked: 22 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#38
Ideally you want to allow users, who have the curiosity to explore, an easy way to get back to a usable device again. Of course practical safeguards are always good. I am certainly comfortable with linux and I have done many a stupid things in the command line (definitely never done sudo rm -rf / though). Finding your way back out of trouble is half the fun!! But I always think twice about trying it out on my N900.
 
Posts: 329 | Thanked: 142 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#39
Okay, let's take them one at a time
Just to mention it, most modern shells now disallow "rm -rf /". Tried it on bash, won't work. That's not to say rm is harmless, "rm -rf /home/user" does work and does considerable damage (i think it may render the account unusable, but i'm not going to try)
I'm not sure bricking a phone is much worse than killing a laptop's os. If the user can follow the flashing guide (doesn't seem that hard), it's pretty much the same thing as reinstalling windows/linux. There's the matter of keeping certain files (settings, contacts) safe through a re-flash. I think the os does that, and other important files can simply be always stored on the card
And noobs don't just "rm -rf" on their own. They usually read it somewhere. The guy/lady writing should warn about a command being potentially dangerous. Whether they do that is another story. Note that's it's also possible to do bad things via gui (like take the red pill - also note that in the thread showing how, the OP never bothered to explain it's dangerous)
__________________
I don't mean to crush your hopes, I just can't help it
 
Posts: 337 | Thanked: 160 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ München, DE
#40
Originally Posted by DaveP1 View Post
I don't ever want to have to use the terminal. The whole point of a GUI is to get away from having to type everything. With a well written GUI, once it is installed, you should be able to do anything without going to whatever terminal is called in whatever OS you are using.
Sure. If you only want to use 30% of the power the operating sytem gives to you via the GUI, there's no need to use the terminal.
 
Reply

Tags
xterm snobs


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:30.