The Following User Says Thank You to c0rt3x For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-08
, 21:35
|
Posts: 589 |
Thanked: 54 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ london
|
#32
|
|
2010-01-08
, 22:01
|
|
Posts: 501 |
Thanked: 292 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#33
|
Not really, I've been monitoring and mine averages 60-70% at 600. I notice a lot of slowdowns and brief non-responsiveness while the CPU is pegged. Why? It 'appears' random, but haven't had the time or energy to mess with finding out.
|
2010-01-08
, 22:08
|
Posts: 398 |
Thanked: 301 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Texas
|
#34
|
Yeah I think all the negative responses are because stability and power conservation are bigger issues right now, whereas there's more than enough performance for anything mildly sane you might want to do with an N900...that said, if you want to risk your unit, it looks like 800Mhz would be quite safe for the CPU since other devices with the same hardware are running this clock speed right out of the box. The only issue is if it might cause a problem with other hardware - these devices weren't made to take different hardware so you never know. I'd try increments of 10Mhz or so until you reach 800 stable if you want to go through with this - remember there may be no way to reset the clock speed. You can't reflash if it doesn't boot because the clock speed is too high.
|
2010-01-09
, 07:25
|
Posts: 356 |
Thanked: 172 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#35
|
|
2010-01-09
, 11:35
|
Posts: 367 |
Thanked: 176 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#36
|
Hold up. Don't confuse the Cortex A8 with the OMAP3430. The Cortex A8 can scale up to 1GHz+ but that doesn't mean the OMAP3430 can. The OMAP3430 is rated at 600MHz. Go above that and you're over clocking, end of story. If you mean other devices with the OMAP3430, please provide references. I would be genuinely interested.
Frank
|
2010-01-09
, 11:46
|
Posts: 1,427 |
Thanked: 2,077 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Sydney
|
#37
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jakiman For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-09
, 12:08
|
Posts: 90 |
Thanked: 29 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#38
|
|
2010-01-09
, 13:41
|
Posts: 398 |
Thanked: 301 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Texas
|
#39
|
Omnia HD (the only hardware difference being less virtual memory, which has nothing to do with the SoC anyway).
|
2010-01-09
, 14:47
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#40
|
|
Enjoy the read if you're interested!