|
2013-04-01
, 09:31
|
|
Posts: 1,648 |
Thanked: 2,122 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ UNKLE's Never Never Land
|
#32
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Saturn For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-04-01
, 10:10
|
|
Posts: 1,239 |
Thanked: 1,278 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
@ Balochistan
|
#33
|
|
2013-04-01
, 16:30
|
|
Posts: 2,222 |
Thanked: 12,651 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ SOL 3
|
#34
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to joerg_rw For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-04-01
, 20:51
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#35
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-04-01
, 21:31
|
Posts: 2,290 |
Thanked: 4,134 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ UK
|
#36
|
|
2013-04-02
, 07:46
|
Posts: 1,808 |
Thanked: 4,272 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Germany
|
#37
|
[*]One or both (I don't recall) of them violates the Debian packaging guidelines (which Maemo packages are supposed to adhere to).
|
2013-04-02
, 08:03
|
Posts: 1,225 |
Thanked: 1,905 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Quezon City, Philippines
|
#38
|
The problem here is that unstable packages (e.g. speedpatch and batterypatch) have passed extras-testing and are now considered stable, i.e. in extras.
|
2013-04-02
, 08:16
|
Posts: 1,808 |
Thanked: 4,272 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Germany
|
#39
|
I think that one solution to this problem is an "extras-labs" repository for packages that interfere with Maemo core system components.
|
2013-04-02
, 10:00
|
Posts: 2,290 |
Thanked: 4,134 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ UK
|
#40
|
That's a funny one. I'm sure Maemo itself breaks Debian packaging guidelines.
Tags |
community, dangerous, extras, harmful, repositories |
|
If you want to support my work, you can donate by PayPal or Flattr
Projects no longer actively developed: here