The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-06-11
, 22:32
|
|
Posts: 634 |
Thanked: 3,266 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Colombia
|
#32
|
I think that they justified price tag by high cost of ensuring "fair" (conflict free) resources used and small production scale, just like Neo900 justified even higher price tag by even smaller production scale, before tha latter flopped.
The Following User Says Thank You to wicket For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-06-12
, 02:15
|
Posts: 649 |
Thanked: 762 times |
Joined on Mar 2012
@ Ohio
|
#33
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to imaginaryenemy For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-06-12
, 04:44
|
|
Posts: 1,196 |
Thanked: 2,708 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Hanoi
|
#34
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ste-phan For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-06-12
, 05:05
|
Posts: 535 |
Thanked: 598 times |
Joined on Apr 2011
@ Republic of the Philippines
|
#35
|
In that case I think the OS should also be "fair" and proven not to negatively impact others.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to vetsin For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-06-12
, 05:28
|
|
Posts: 1,196 |
Thanked: 2,708 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Hanoi
|
#36
|
I think you should check how negatively conflict minerals are affecting people before posting this kind of comment... I can't see how software can have the same impact.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_minerals
There's a mainstream movie about this too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_Diamond_%28film%29
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to ste-phan For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-06-12
, 08:52
|
Posts: 535 |
Thanked: 598 times |
Joined on Apr 2011
@ Republic of the Philippines
|
#37
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to vetsin For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-06-12
, 12:34
|
|
Posts: 1,196 |
Thanked: 2,708 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Hanoi
|
#38
|
that's a nice perspective but I think no matter what the OS is, it's the marketing people that will push the upgrade cycle with whatever reason they can think of.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ste-phan For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-06-14
, 12:41
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#39
|
Undoubtedly.
Fair trade is becoming a marketing term quickly.
IMO owning a Fairphone out of ethical principles means you'd want hold on to it as long as you can.
So Fairphone users, gather at together.jolla.com ,demand commitment by a fair(er) OS maker to support your hardware patform.
More choice in software options means wider support, less user boredom and prolonged device life cycle.
Currently amongst others, the "old" Samsung Galaxy S3 LTE will be recycled by Sailfish OS. I think Fairphone might want to be in that list.
Current vacuum of more or less essential applications for Sailfish due to developers having no central way to get paid for their efforts could be filled by other developers' software supporting the fair principle.
10 essential free fairapps for Fairphone supporters using Sailfish (later optionally payable for other Sailfish users) Just a silly marketing idea?
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dave999 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-06-16
, 14:27
|
|
Posts: 138 |
Thanked: 185 times |
Joined on Feb 2014
|
#40
|
Tags |
android, fair phone, fairphone2 |
|
What I object to is that, with all the fairness, responsible resourcing and all that jazz, it is still just an Android phone. In other words, there is nothing special about it that makes me want to break my legs in the rush to buy it.
Make the same device but put some interesting OS on it and I might consider it.