![]() |
2010-01-02
, 21:02
|
Posts: 1 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Helsinki
|
#31
|
![]() |
2010-01-17
, 02:48
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#32
|
Well, now put yourself in the position of Ovi Maps. Imagine that one of the 15 proposals is due next week and the other 14 are not even roadmapped. Should we resolve "Implemented" selecting only the one solution or should we leave the item open until, say 7 of the 15 eally different proposals are implemented?
In the meantime, imagine that Feature X proposed in Solution N is not implemented by Ovi Maps yet but there are several alternatives that implement it very well. Do we need to keep that part open because the solutions need to be around Ovi Maps or would users be happy just by getting the features from anybody now?
I believe some of the most voted "solutions" would deserve a brainstorm in its own. Turn by turn navigation is a good example.
![]() |
2010-01-26
, 12:48
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#33
|
![]() |
2010-01-28
, 12:26
|
Posts: 36 |
Thanked: 23 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Saudi Arabia
|
#34
|
A concrete example:
http://maemo.org/community/brainstor...igation_on_ovi is the most "popular" brainstorm at http://maemo.org/community/brainstorm and
"Solution #2: Free turn by turn navigation on OVI" is the 5th most popular proposal of solution.
I want to comment officially on it, since there was an official announcement last week about Nokia Maps offering free navigation. However, if I move the brainstorm to Under Development selecting that solution at the same time the other 22 proposals will be carried away with the move.
Maybe some of them will be implemented by Ovi Maps but I don't want to get into more details now. Please tell me how to proceed.