![]() |
2008-02-25
, 14:35
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#31
|
![]() |
2008-02-25
, 14:41
|
Posts: 344 |
Thanked: 26 times |
Joined on Jan 2007
|
#32
|
Lol, how's that different, aside from the desktop, than now?
"The new Nokia N810 provides a superb multimedia experience with a gorgeous 4.1" 800x480 screen, while providing best in class web browser based on the popular Firefox desktop browser. You can stream internet radio, keep in touch with your friends on your favorite instant messenger or social website, and when you're done, it fits in your front pocket!"
![]() |
2008-02-25
, 14:43
|
Posts: 566 |
Thanked: 150 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#33
|
Lol, how's that different, aside from the desktop, than now?
"The new Nokia N810 provides a superb multimedia experience with a gorgeous 4.1" 800x480 screen, while providing best in class web browser based on the popular Firefox desktop browser. You can stream internet radio, keep in touch with your friends on your favorite instant messenger or social website, and when you're done, it fits in your front pocket!"
![]() |
2008-02-25
, 15:05
|
Posts: 472 |
Thanked: 107 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
@ Texas
|
#34
|
It needs a focus that it IS good at, and document editing is something the current tablets COULD do. Multimedia support is weak due to hardware limitations, both in storage and capability (tearing, low bit rates).
The multimedia experience is NOT superb. There is no media management, and video is sub-par. The built in media player is adequate at best, and Canola needs to be installed to give a decent front end.
You buy an iPod Touch and its very straight forward, you fill up iTunes and it syncs down automatically. You can purchase movies and music, subscribe to podcasts and its sync'd. That is what end users need, they are not technical like us.
I love the N810... they keyboard has transformed this device for me, as I like to IM heavily. These are just my thoughts on helping it go mass market
The Following User Says Thank You to rcadden For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2008-02-25
, 16:02
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#35
|
I don't get the one device obsession. I used to be on it myself (last device was a HTC universal with extended battery - Brick).
But have come to the conclusion that if I want a big screen, then it is not practical to have a 1 device solution. 2 devices works well. 1 big screen and then any phone (with 3G and BT support) you want.
Until there is a change in technology, 2 devices works best for me. Still waiting for something lightweight that projects straight onto your retina or perhaps a scroll type roll out screen. Then, a big screen and a single device might be an option.
It has allowed me to get a Nokia N82 with great Camera, flash, 3G etc. and when push really comes to shove, I can leave one of them at home etc.
1 device stays in your pocket while you use the other one all seamlessly. Where's the problem.
Also, I assume most people would rather not pay for 2 phone contracts when 1 will do just fine ?
Zuber
![]() |
2008-02-25
, 16:11
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#36
|
features like "excellent Microsoft Office compatibility" don't come free.
![]() |
2008-02-25
, 16:26
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#37
|
For me, if I'm going to carry a second device it might as well be a small laptop, which is ever so much more capable and only moderately more inconvenient to carry.
![]() |
2008-02-25
, 16:44
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#38
|
![]() |
2008-02-25
, 16:47
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#39
|
It is tricky to market these things I guess. Selling something by saying what features it does not have (PIM,GSM, synching,office compatibility) wouldn't work. But by not mentioning it you will get reviews like these.
![]() |
2008-02-25
, 17:31
|
Posts: 472 |
Thanked: 107 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
@ Texas
|
#40
|
It shouldn't be that way though, walrus. Reviewers, of all people, should do their homework. Period. Complaining by supposed professionals about the lack of nonadvertised (and especially unintended) features is irresponsible. Those folks have an obligation to their readers to get details correct, and when they don't, they are failing.
Nokia certainly shares responsibility for misunderstandings, but at the end of the day it is up to the reviewers to be accurate.
The Following User Says Thank You to rcadden For This Useful Post: | ||