Reply
Thread Tools
cashless's Avatar
Posts: 159 | Thanked: 21 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ Houston, texas
#31
Originally Posted by vbrilon View Post
<sarcasm> I am sure it has nothing to do with the fact that the LTE standard (specifically release 8 of UMTS) is not finalized. </sarcasm>

"Dammit Nokia! Hurry up and deliver products to standards that haven't been invented yet. And do it quick. And cheap!"

Did I miss anything?
In my case, I will probably see LTE before I see Wimax.
 
Posts: 1,418 | Thanked: 1,541 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#32
Originally Posted by F1shb0ne View Post
[url]"Google intends to commit a minimum of $4.6 billion to bidding"
What does it have to do with derailing WiMax though?
 
Bundyo's Avatar
Posts: 4,708 | Thanked: 4,649 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Bulgaria
#33
Originally Posted by cashless View Post
In my case, I will probably see LTE before I see Wimax.
You probably won't *see* them at all.
 
Posts: 1,513 | Thanked: 2,248 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ US
#34
Originally Posted by acevid View Post
Just seems like the device and it's killer feature (anywhere broadband) and the reality on the ground as far as the network that's supposed to deliver said broadband aren't matching up..yet.

Every consumer has a threshold of what they're willing to gamble their money on (even a consumer that fits the tablet user profile)...I'm not a Sprint or Nokia innvestor..why should I gamble my money on their device and network? It's a honest and reasonable question...
Yes, it's a reasonable question, but it hasn't quite been put to you yet. I suspect it will not be anytime during Q2. Keep in mind that Nokia has said they will sell the 810wme retail only where there is a network.
 
brontide's Avatar
Posts: 868 | Thanked: 474 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Capital District, NY, USA
#35
The thing that bugs me about WiMAX is the NIT's have a non trivial list of issues that need work. Here they invest time, money, and marketing into a new feature that will have little to no impact on the current deficiencies or appeal of the device. I'm sure there was some high "muckety-muck" meeting that decided that the NIT's would be a great way to trail blaze on WiMAX and, well, if it didn't pan out it's not like most people would care.

WiMAX is doubly silly since, like it or not, EDGE would have probably maxed out the bus bandwidth of this device and allowed it to interoperate with data networks in almost every country. That would have immediate impact on the community and appeal of the NIT's and solved an issue that many people have with the device.
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#36
brontide, I don't think any decision on the platform is going to make you happy at this point.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
brontide's Avatar
Posts: 868 | Thanked: 474 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Capital District, NY, USA
#37
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
brontide, I don't think any decision on the platform is going to make you happy at this point.
And yet I still try to give positive ( and negative where necessary ) feedback, develop work arounds for crappy defaults, and write scripts to sync data for iTunes and iPhoto. All you seem to do is add one or two line replies or Troll people who are critical of your employer.
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#38
Originally Posted by brontide View Post
The thing that bugs me about WiMAX is the NIT's have a non trivial list of issues that need work.
So they should cease all hardware and software development until your personal list of bugs and issues are fixed? You do realize that the hardware team can't really do anything about software issues, right? And that the software team can still work on other issues while the hardware team is working on a new tablet? (see Diablo for the perfect example of this incredible phenomenon )

Originally Posted by brontide View Post
Here they invest time, money, and marketing into a new feature that will have little to no impact on the current deficiencies or appeal of the device.
To you perhaps, but you're developing a bit of a reputation of an unsatisfiable customer. WiMAX does appeal to a lot of people, and may very well solve many of their on-the-go data access issues in the short-term, and perhaps all of them in the long.

Originally Posted by brontide View Post
WiMAX is doubly silly since, like it or not, EDGE would have probably maxed out the bus bandwidth of this device and allowed it to interoperate with data networks in almost every country.
EDGE maxed out the 'bus bandwidth'? Which 'bus bandwidth', exactly? EDGE will get you 15KB/sec max, that's certainly not maxing out any 'bus bandwidth' that I know of. EDGE is the past, Nokia is looking towards the future.

Originally Posted by brontide View Post
That would have immediate impact on the community and appeal of the NIT's and solved an issue that many people have with the device.
. . . and turning the device into a cellphone will take a hell of a lot more time and energy away from that "non trivial list of issues" of yours than simple WiMAX compatibility.

Looking back at you laundry list of issues, I can see that most of the issues are either long-term issues (major UI stuff), hardware issues, or currently already actively being worked on (Modest, rtcomm, etc).
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post:
IcelandDreams's Avatar
Posts: 228 | Thanked: 30 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ Ontario & Iceland
#39
Originally Posted by brontide View Post
EDGE would have probably maxed out the bus bandwidth of this device and allowed it to interoperate with data networks in almost every country
Unless you live in Canada.... We need something that isn't tied to *any* cell provider as the entire wireless data industry is totally screwed here. I don't even own a plain cell phone because of what the industry has become up here. We've had great wired access (cheap and fast) for a long time but wireless is probably the worst on this planet or any other.

So WiMAX is just one contender and I welcome the attempt. Not that I'm jumping on the bandwagon. In fact I'd rather see something that is more likely to be a global standard but anything right now can only help to shake up the incumbents.

As for Nokia taking a risk I don't see it as too much of a problem since they can likely replace and rebrand the IT with whatever radio they need. I'm not likely to be the early adopter unless I get a break on the price but I'm keeping my eyes open.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to IcelandDreams For This Useful Post:
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#40
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
EDGE maxed out the 'bus bandwidth'? Which 'bus bandwidth', exactly? EDGE will get you 15KB/sec max, that's certainly not maxing out any 'bus bandwidth' that I know of. EDGE is the past, Nokia is looking towards the future.
Well, a 115 kb/s serial link, if you integrated the module as I (jokingly) suggested, via the serial console pins. Of course, I'm not even sure what speed that is, 115k is an assumption, but... ya know, it could max out something.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Benson For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:04.