![]() |
2009-02-21
, 23:28
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#32
|
No, it would slow down immensely, as described on the linked page. We don't intend to switch to busybox as busybox is the root of all application incompatibilities on Maemo..
Well, we have Maemo GTK - so there is different tap and hold handling. However, we could consider LD_PRELOADing libgtkstylus to non-Hildon applications? That'd be interesting.
The Following User Says Thank You to qole For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-02-21
, 23:34
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#33
|
(shrug) Ok.
Yes, I was referring to making non-hildon apps more stylus-friendly.
I thought that's what I was doing. Sorry if it seemed otherwise...
![]() |
2009-02-25
, 07:57
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#34
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to qole For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-03-01
, 07:03
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#35
|
We don't intend to switch to busybox as busybox is the root of all application incompatibilities on Maemo..
![]() |
2009-03-02
, 10:56
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#36
|
Interestingly, according to the Fremantle wiki page, Nokia is planning to continue using Busybox; they've opened up development of it, too. There's a Maemo Busybox garage project page as of Feb 17th...
The fact that Maemo will continue to use Busybox shouldn't impact Mer's Maemo compatibility negatively, right?
The Following User Says Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-03-02
, 18:47
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
|
#37
|
![]() |
2009-03-02
, 19:11
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#38
|
Hi everybody!
I'm trying to figure out which kernel to use with Mer 0.8 on a 770. Looks like kernel used in OS2008HE is 2.6.16.27-omap1 and doesn't support SDHC so it can't use my MMC. It seems to work with fanoush's kernel but I was wondering if there was a better one out there based on 2.6.28-omap1 kernel. Which kernel to use? Do I have to compile it myself or it is available somewhere.
Sorry if the question seems dumb and thanks for helping me out.
pancho
![]() |
2009-03-02
, 19:24
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#39
|
![]() |
2009-03-02
, 19:35
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
|
#40
|
I'd personally use the new Mer 0.9 release which just came out, and use fanoush's SDHC kernel.
You will need at least a 1gb MMC, and these instructions are based on OS2008HE kernel. 48mhz kernel is highly recommended
![]() |
Tags |
mer, mer release extras |
|
As you go on to other communities, remember to build them around politeness, respect, trust and humility. Be wary of poisonous people and deal with them before they end up killing your community.. Seen it happen to too many IRC channels, forums, open source projects.