![]() |
2009-07-10
, 21:14
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#32
|
The Following User Says Thank You to YoDude For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-07-11
, 10:16
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#33
|
I think I will ask something along the lines of, "Would Nokia consider giving end-of-life versions of Maemo to the community to maintain? Or does Nokia expect the community to exclusively use parallel versions of Maemo, like Mer, if they wish to take control after Nokia ends support?"
The Following User Says Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-07-11
, 11:14
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#34
|
Thanks, just make it clear that this is not a request for opening up any components that are not already open, but for enabling the community to publish its own unofficial updates.
![]() |
2009-07-12
, 15:56
|
|
Posts: 2,535 |
Thanked: 6,681 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ UK
|
#35
|
"Would Nokia consider giving end-of-life versions of Maemo to the community to maintain? Or does Nokia expect the community to exclusively use parallel versions of Maemo, like Mer, if they wish to take control after Nokia ends support?"
![]() |
2009-07-12
, 16:05
|
|
Posts: 4,274 |
Thanked: 5,358 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Looking at y'all and sighing
|
#36
|
I'd like to see some extra volunteers on this (promotion, packaging, testing) rather than "the usual suspects": this is a perfect opportunity to get involved at a high-level in the Maemo community quickly, without lots of technical skill necessary.
![]() |
2009-07-12
, 16:14
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#37
|
Basically, the plan is as follows - and anyone in the community can help with this:
Given this concrete plan has evolved over the past few weeks, this is now in a position to be actually enacted. I'd like to see some extra volunteers on this (promotion, packaging, testing) rather than "the usual suspects"
![]() |
2009-08-12
, 19:40
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#38
|
![]() |
2009-08-12
, 19:54
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#39
|
![]() |
2009-08-12
, 20:04
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#40
|
But we can agree to disagree - let's allow Nokia to continue to trot out their "consumer device" excuse while making the most of open source code when at the same time making a complete hash of the supposedly open development process which will only serve to alienate the community they so desperately need if this product/project is going to succeed in the long term, which is by no means certain.
Intel and others will continue to show how commercial open source development can be done right, and will gain a much larger and devoted community as a result.