![]() |
2010-02-13
, 23:52
|
Posts: 85 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Kuopio
|
#31
|
![]() |
2010-02-14
, 22:26
|
|
Posts: 1,259 |
Thanked: 1,341 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#32
|
The thumbnail view is a perfect example of how it should be.
The way it is now it has no kinetic energy.
![]() |
2010-02-15
, 10:01
|
Posts: 85 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Kuopio
|
#33
|
![]() |
2010-02-15
, 10:25
|
Posts: 127 |
Thanked: 44 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Nottingham
|
#34
|
Hmm... it has kinetic scrolling. But without enought power. Correct.
So should I add a solution #4 to ajust the actual kinetic scrolling?
What about Post #12 from texrat. The kinetic scrolling should depend on the page lenght.
A good idea or not?
![]() |
2010-02-15
, 12:14
|
Posts: 127 |
Thanked: 44 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Nottingham
|
#35
|
The Following User Says Thank You to spoonbuddy For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-02-15
, 15:50
|
|
Posts: 1,259 |
Thanked: 1,341 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#36
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Helmuth For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-02-16
, 11:17
|
Posts: 85 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Kuopio
|
#37
|
What about modifying the kinetic scrolling this way:
Scroll slow on the left side of the screen and fast (with even more kinetic power) on the right side of the screen?
Just a thought without judging. What do you think about this Idea?
![]() |
2010-02-25
, 13:00
|
Posts: 93 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ UK
|
#38
|
The Following User Says Thank You to bald.eagle.one For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-05-13
, 11:30
|
Posts: 131 |
Thanked: 14 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#40
|