Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
shazosbourne's Avatar
Posts: 257 | Thanked: 205 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Sydney, Australia
#31
Originally Posted by MohammadAG View Post
@ pelago that doesn't seem to be it, compiled HD with 0.85 but it's the same (to me at least).
I thought You'd be going he other way, say..... back to 99?
Never mind me if I have misunderstood.
 
pelago's Avatar
Posts: 2,121 | Thanked: 1,540 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ Oxford, UK
#32
Originally Posted by shazosbourne View Post
I thought You'd be going he other way, say..... back to 99?
Never mind me if I have misunderstood.
Ah yes, that's right, I had forgotten the details. To quote my own post:

Originally Posted by pelago View Post
It looks like the deceleration was previously 0.99 in PR1.1.1, then changed to 0.85 in an unreleased version, and now in PR1.2 it is 0.90.
I probably shouldn't have mentioned the 0.85 thing, as that wasn't in a released version and just confuses the matter. 0.99 is what you want if you want to put that particular file to how it was in PR1.1.1, if my analysis is correct.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:07.