![]() |
2010-08-23
, 13:16
|
|
Posts: 2,535 |
Thanked: 6,681 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ UK
|
#32
|
![]() |
2010-09-25
, 14:01
|
|
Posts: 1,648 |
Thanked: 2,122 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ UNKLE's Never Never Land
|
#33
|
Super-testers
Super-testers are members of the testing-squad with a proven track record (currently testers with more than 100 package testing karma). Their votes (can) count a bit differently than those of regular testers.
The Following User Says Thank You to Saturn For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-09-27
, 07:46
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#34
|
The only problem I see is this (from Super-testers):
That is, testing karma of 100 is not any prof at all if the tester knows anything about what he's doing!
Cheers
![]() |
2010-09-28
, 08:44
|
Posts: 249 |
Thanked: 167 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ International
|
#35
|
The Following User Says Thank You to gryedouge For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-09-29
, 10:00
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#36
|
'If you don't feel ready to join the testing Squad or don't have enough skills, you can still help by testing the applications from a user point of view (functionalities, description, etc...). For more information read article Help testing software.'
I am wanting to test/assist along these lines (and then maybe, when i have enough experience apply as a tester) and have done so for a few apps. Do i need to do so as per the QA checklist or, as I have been doing so far, from a general end-user perspective of basic looks, functionality, integration, navigation, completeness of app, etc?
The Following User Says Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-09-29
, 12:06
|
Posts: 249 |
Thanked: 167 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ International
|
#37
|
![]() |
2010-10-16
, 22:46
|
|
Posts: 199 |
Thanked: 156 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Holland
|
#38
|
if you have a "niche" apps with less than 10 users your apps will never reach extras ...
I personally would like to know whether the developer thinks a given program is ready for popular consumption or not. An actual comment by a developer might even be handy. Like "this might have a few bugs but is probably not dangerous".
I think that the hysterical warnings quoted above are less than helpful. They have the effect of warning fearful users not to try out programs that are perfectly safe in general.
All I want is 40 acres, a mule, and Xterm.