The Following User Says Thank You to YoDude For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-10-19
, 04:06
|
Posts: 440 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Las Vegas, NV
|
#32
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Joseph9560 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-10-19
, 04:12
|
Posts: 440 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Las Vegas, NV
|
#33
|
![]() |
2010-10-19
, 04:14
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#34
|
Hence my quoted question in the OP...
***
As reported, the rules may not require that the app be an original product, free of license restrictions, or made available for consumption in any way shape or form... If this is the case then I don't know what the point of this whole "competition" thing was...
It is Nokia's responsibility to its stock holders to expect a reasonable return on the money it spends. How would they explain this?
There must be an Ambiguity Division at Nokia. If there is, then the N900 would be its flagship model.
The Following User Says Thank You to geneven For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-10-19
, 04:39
|
Posts: 1,463 |
Thanked: 1,916 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Edmonton, AB
|
#35
|
Stellarium Mobile has a few additional modules, including a GUI specifically tailored for a small screen and support for the N900's GPS and accelerometer. The problem is that the developer was hoping to get some money from it in Nokia's Ovi application store. He thought that leaving it licensed under the GPL wouldn't work for a commercial application, so he asked for an exception from the rest of the developers. Not all agreed, so at the moment the project hasn't been released. I don't know what Fabien is going to do eventually. (Oh, and he is the lead developer, which is a bit awkward.)
![]() |
2010-10-19
, 05:35
|
Posts: 2,006 |
Thanked: 3,351 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ N900: Battery low. N950: torx 4 re-used once and fine; SIM port torn apart
|
#36
|
![]() |
2010-10-19
, 05:50
|
Posts: 842 |
Thanked: 1,197 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#37
|
![]() |
2010-10-19
, 06:14
|
|
Posts: 4,365 |
Thanked: 2,467 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Australia Mate
|
#38
|
The Following User Says Thank You to F2thaK For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-10-19
, 06:25
|
Posts: 883 |
Thanked: 980 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Bern, Switzerland
|
#39
|
![]() |
2010-10-19
, 06:55
|
Posts: 35 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#40
|
Oh no please stop the "greedy" and" nobody is gonna pay" lamentations. This is SO typical of todays everything-must-be-free behaviour.
Developing software is a hard and skilled work, but making it ready for end-users is even harder. Properly finishing, testing, documenting, packaging and supporting an app is NO FUN at all. You want to get a proper app? Pay a little something for it. You paid hundreds of $ for the hardware and dozens for $ for the services. Why not pay a few $ for a premium app? 12k is perhaps a two month salary for a skilled western developer - how much time did go into Stellarium over the years?
The Following User Says Thank You to Popanz For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
contest, innovators, stellarium |
|
***
As reported, the rules may not require that the app be an original product, free of license restrictions, or made available for consumption in any way shape or form... If this is the case then I don't know what the point of this whole "competition" thing was...
It is Nokia's responsibility to its stock holders to expect a reasonable return on the money it spends. How would they explain this?
There must be an Ambiguity Division at Nokia. If there is, then the N900 would be its flagship model.
SLN member # 009