![]() |
2011-09-15
, 09:31
|
Posts: 196 |
Thanked: 224 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Africa
|
#32
|
You are still obliged to pay.
Locking a phone to a particular SIM is a form of monopoly.
BTW: they don't need to lock up the phone itself for SIM enforcement. It is enough to use the GSM module for that purpose.
I don't believe somebody else should decide what is run/played on my device.
I don't want a mainstream device.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to buchanmilne For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-09-15
, 09:34
|
Posts: 196 |
Thanked: 224 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Africa
|
#33
|
The most obvious implication of the diagram from the presentation I've posted is that it is not possible to effectivly use kernel that is not signed by nokia.
Even the bootloader is verified.
![]() |
2011-09-15
, 09:38
|
Posts: 673 |
Thanked: 856 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
|
#34
|
Nah, you got your timelines mixed up. MeeGo 1.2 release came after Feb11.
Anyway.
For freedom lovers, if:
* SIM lock isn't active
* Security lock isn't active (you know, pincode, protecting data)
* Developer mode is active (i'm a little unsure if this is even required)
You can flash your own kernel and rootfs without aegis. We have MeeGo CE running with phonecalls, etc.
![]() |
2011-09-15
, 09:42
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#35
|
Thanks for clearing that part: custom kernels can run under "Open Mode".
Do you know if the Service Providers will be able to disable Open Mode (Development Mode)? Diagram suggests that as possibility, and that is important for people obtaining N9s through contract.
![]() |
2011-09-15
, 09:49
|
Posts: 196 |
Thanked: 224 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Africa
|
#36
|
I don't believe somebody else should decide what is run/played on my device.
![]() |
2011-09-15
, 09:50
|
Posts: 673 |
Thanked: 856 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
|
#37
|
So no modern phones subsidised by contracts are able to make phone calls (which is where the operator is hoping to recover their subsidy) via any means but GSM?
I would accept a device which *can*, but doesn't always need to, enforce "platform security", in order to be competitive in certain restrictive markets which have a huge influence on device adoption, *if* I have the choice to disable the platform security.
Again, this is not a technical issue. If you don't like the fact that your operator only provides sim-locked devices (note, this is check done before checking if open mode is allowed, so no unlocked phone can be prevented from being used in open mode), then I fail to see why you use this operator.
If your country allows all operators to sim-lock all phones forever, well, I think you have bigger problems ...
![]() |
2011-09-15
, 09:54
|
Posts: 673 |
Thanked: 856 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
|
#38
|
If you obtain a device through contract, the terms and conditions of it's usage is through that contract. Usually they'll do this through SIM lock.
If you want full freedom, pay for the whole thing at once. It's often cheaper to get a temporary loan with the bank anyway and/or set aside money.
![]() |
2011-09-15
, 10:03
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#39
|
Is there any quick way of checking if Open Mode is disabled on device while running Harmattan?
![]() |
2011-09-21
, 11:33
|
|
Posts: 48 |
Thanked: 80 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
@ France
|
#40
|
![]() |
Tags |
locked boot, neutered, trecherous |
|
Anyway.
For freedom lovers, if:
* SIM lock isn't active
* Security lock isn't active (you know, pincode, protecting data)
* Developer mode is active (i'm a little unsure if this is even required)
You can flash your own kernel and rootfs without aegis. We have MeeGo CE running with phonecalls, etc.
As you go on to other communities, remember to build them around politeness, respect, trust and humility. Be wary of poisonous people and deal with them before they end up killing your community.. Seen it happen to too many IRC channels, forums, open source projects.