![]() |
2014-01-07
, 13:06
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 3,718 |
Thanked: 7,420 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bize Her Yer Trabzon
|
#32
|
I preferred the first plastic model personally. At least that looked unusual and the price was better.
The steel model looks cheaper, like a cheap fashion knockoff brand watch, but isn't.
I still don't see the point though until you can get months out of the battery. These smar****ch designers seem to forget what is useful about non-smar****ches.
The Sony smar****ch I had for about 2 months was annoying, requiring recharging every 3-5 days and it looked a heck of a lot better than the pebble. The main problem though was it never managed to keep a connection with my phone and didn't work as a watch unless connected to get the time from the phone. And then Sony stopped updating their app for that model smar****ch and the old software didn't work on Android 4.x.
edit: sigh. the forum software doesn't like T W A T.
The Following User Says Thank You to HtheB For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2014-01-07
, 13:12
|
|
Posts: 1,839 |
Thanked: 2,432 times |
Joined on May 2009
|
#33
|
I preferred the first plastic model personally. At least that looked unusual and the price was better.
The steel model looks cheaper, like a cheap fashion knockoff brand watch, but isn't.
I still don't see the point though until you can get months out of the battery. These smar****ch designers seem to forget what is useful about non-smar****ches.
I actually bought the Pebble Steel because it looks a lot more stylish.
Battery last way longer on the Pebble then on the Sony smart watches... Note that the screen on Pebble is always on, while all the other smart watches out there you need to something before you see the time, like pressing a button.
There is also an appstore announced for the Pebble watch. I think that guys like Pebble will support their watches better then other companies
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to tissot For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2014-01-07
, 16:35
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#34
|
![]() |
2014-01-07
, 16:59
|
Posts: 728 |
Thanked: 1,217 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
|
#35
|
![]() |
2014-01-07
, 21:52
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#36
|
![]() |
2014-01-07
, 22:42
|
Posts: 661 |
Thanked: 1,625 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
@ Croatia,Zagreb
|
#37
|
![]() |
2014-01-07
, 22:50
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#38
|
![]() |
2014-01-08
, 00:35
|
|
Posts: 1,789 |
Thanked: 1,699 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#39
|
Dude, you are never happy. I bet you complain about same thing next year when your level of acceptance changesI'm right or am I right?
![]() |
2014-01-08
, 06:14
|
|
Posts: 694 |
Thanked: 619 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#40
|
The steel model looks cheaper, like a cheap fashion knockoff brand watch, but isn't.
I still don't see the point though until you can get months out of the battery. These smar****ch designers seem to forget what is useful about non-smar****ches.
The Sony smar****ch I had for about 2 months was annoying, requiring recharging every 3-5 days and it looked a heck of a lot better than the pebble. The main problem though was it never managed to keep a connection with my phone and didn't work as a watch unless connected to get the time from the phone. And then Sony stopped updating their app for that model smar****ch and the old software didn't work on Android 4.x.
edit: sigh. the forum software doesn't like T W A T.