The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-01-19
, 19:54
|
Posts: 336 |
Thanked: 129 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ portugal
|
#392
|
|
2012-01-19
, 20:23
|
Posts: 3,328 |
Thanked: 4,476 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Poland
|
#393
|
Both vdd1 and vdd2 could be enabled in PR1.3 kernel AFAIK. And why you are using only vdd1 with omap1, actually that is the unstable one (because of incorrect calibration values written in efuse), there has never been reports of vdd2 being unstable AFAIK.
And please stop promoting undervolting profiles with SR enabled. It is either use copy of dsp/default with MIN/MAX frequencies according to your needs (default has SR enabled) or some undervolting profile with SR *DISABLED*. Re-read my previous post again. I really don't want SR reported as unstable, because someone is playing with SR and undervolted profiles.
SmartReflex(TM) is known to be unstable on some devices and may cause some random reboots.
Starting with PR 1.2, Nokia has disabled "VDD 2 SR" in order to make the device more stable. This is why QCPUFreq only enables VDD1 SmartReflex(TM).
|
2012-01-25
, 07:59
|
Posts: 172 |
Thanked: 98 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Forest of Dean, England.
|
#394
|
Tags |
faster, reflash, refresh, script-a-brick, sell it |
|
And please stop promoting undervolting profiles with SR enabled. It is either use copy of dsp/default with MIN/MAX frequencies according to your needs (default has SR enabled) or some undervolting profile with SR *DISABLED*. Re-read my previous post again. I really don't want SR reported as unstable, because someone is playing with SR and undervolted profiles.