Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 283 | Thanked: 336 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Germany
#4031
Originally Posted by Brock View Post
we believe in U8500

nobody knows the used cpu, K123 just made a guess without any proof... so it could (and should) be a dual core
k123 also said that he really doesn’t believe it’s dual core, so...
 
Posts: 233 | Thanked: 516 times | Joined on May 2011
#4032
Originally Posted by zymo View Post
k123 also said that he really doesn’t believe it’s dual core, so...
i asked two three seniors. all say no dual core so i guess no. i have no proof for either ways for this so even i don't know.
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Koajwujwer123 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 284 | Thanked: 161 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#4033
Originally Posted by Koajwujwer123 View Post
The iPhone exists but its FCC filing does not appear till after announcement. Do you not realise that Nokia can ask FCC to hide the filing ? The keyboard phone is not coming out so it doesn't make a difference if the FCC filing is shown.
no, the iphone filing exists before, and is under the same STC/LTC as nokia requested.

this is asinine, how is it that we're non believers when the ppl talking have nothing to point to but their own words, when i have presented documents and acknowledgements? aka FACTS bka HARD INFORMATION

if the HWKB wasnt supposed to come the USA as claimed by the last few obscene posts, then there would be no ****ing reason to have the FCC test it. this is ridiculous.

again, not saying lankku doesnt exist, theres just no proof. the hwkb otoh ... has been leaking for a year. rationalize that away ...
 
Posts: 283 | Thanked: 336 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Germany
#4034
Originally Posted by Koajwujwer123 View Post
i asked two three seniors. all say no dual core so i guess no. i have no proof for either ways for this so even i don't know.
it would have been nice to have a high-end device that can play and recored Full-Hd movies. Anyway, 720p is great too if there is a hdmi-port so i can plug it to my TV
 

The Following User Says Thank You to zymo For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,873 | Thanked: 4,529 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ North Potomac MD
#4035
Originally Posted by zehjotkah View Post
Koajwujwer123 just showed me the photos he does have.
It corresponds to the info I had before.
He is 100% telling the truth.
Hey! Can I see it too? I promise I won't post it!
 
erendorn's Avatar
Posts: 738 | Thanked: 983 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ London
#4036
shady, while you concentrate on the phones that exist (but have no proof that they will be marketed), we concentrate on phones that will be marketed (but have no proof that they exist).

Because we don't care what exists if we won't ever get one (as somehow it doesn't exist either for us).

Please notice the difference, and stop annoying people.

ps: teaser + FCC = proof that software is almost ready = proof that a device will be marketed.
we are talking about this device. not specifically the one seen in those two documents.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to erendorn For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#4037
Originally Posted by generationally View Post
I think that you may be right about the consumer device not coming to the u.s.

Nokia is going to use Windows Phone to try to finally get into the u.s. market. They don't want to risk that strategy by putting out a Meego/Harmattan device in the u.s. which has no future. So I predict no consumer device for the u.s. Good I live in Europe
How can u be sure it will come to european? Maybe its other way around.
 
Posts: 284 | Thanked: 161 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#4038
Originally Posted by erendorn View Post
shady, while you concentrate on the phones that exist (but have no proof that they will be marketed), we concentrate on phones that will be marketed (but have no proof that they exist).

Because we don't care what exists if we won't ever get one (as somehow it doesn't exist either for us).

Please notice the difference, and stop annoying people.

ps: teaser + FCC = proof that software is almost ready = proof that a device will be marketed.
we are talking about this device. not specifically the one seen in those two documents.
why? its like discussing imaginary phones and specs, when white sheet is going to drop in 2 weeks?

i dont give a rats *** if im annoying anyone, every single post here thats divergent from the orginal topic is annoying, if someone has a problem the board features a handy ignore button, trust me you wont hurt my feelings if you use it. but you wont because im speaking the truth or at least the visible truth, and you cant make it disappear no matter how hard anyone tries. its in the docs all this other discussion is based on ... ?

seriously what is this discussion based on, can anyone tell me?

and no, the FCC is not proof of A device, its proof of THE device. youre talking about a ghost, a figment of an overactive childs imagination. you trust this kid, who has been a steady member for .. a whole week! congrats, way to critically analyze whats happening.

reading is a lost art.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to shady For This Useful Post:
NvyUs's Avatar
Posts: 1,885 | Thanked: 2,008 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ OVI MAPS
#4039
Shady you need to find yourself a Woman to let out some of the frustration of never getting to buy the device with a HWKB
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to NvyUs For This Useful Post:
Posts: 284 | Thanked: 161 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#4040
Originally Posted by NvyUs View Post
Shady you need to find yourself a Woman
thank you for equating my zeal for the truth and what we KNOW, to sexual frustration.

cute
 

The Following User Says Thank You to shady For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
duke nukem4eva, epic!, harmattan, n-950, nokia diamond, non-believers, rm680, wasteland


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:47.