|
2016-03-27
, 18:10
|
Posts: 1,293 |
Thanked: 4,319 times |
Joined on Oct 2014
|
#402
|
The Following User Says Thank You to nieldk For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-04-03
, 13:55
|
Posts: 1,873 |
Thanked: 4,529 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ North Potomac MD
|
#403
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mscion For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-04-03
, 21:35
|
|
Posts: 6,447 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#404
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-04-06
, 15:00
|
Posts: 1,873 |
Thanked: 4,529 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ North Potomac MD
|
#405
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mscion For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-04-06
, 15:25
|
Posts: 1,038 |
Thanked: 3,980 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ USA
|
#406
|
Would somebody please explain what advantages this dual camera system brings. Stereo pics? Better lower light images? Thanks!
http://www.techtimes.com/articles/14...hotography.htm
|
2016-04-06
, 15:33
|
Posts: 1,873 |
Thanked: 4,529 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ North Potomac MD
|
#407
|
Good question. If they're identical sensors and lenses, it would have to be doing two things simultaneously that required different sensor settings e.g., gain, color balance. OTOH, if they had different lenses or sensors, they each be optimized for different conditions or purposes.
But it sure does seem awfully close together for stereo.vision. Although birds do it, we still haven't quite built eagle's eyes in silicon yet.
How about one-shot super-wide angle? Super HuweiScope? Kinda far-fetched, maybe. But doing really wide aspect shots wastes a lot of one lens.
Pure WAGs on my part.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mscion For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-04-06
, 16:51
|
Posts: 1,873 |
Thanked: 4,529 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ North Potomac MD
|
#408
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mscion For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-04-06
, 17:06
|
|
Posts: 3,141 |
Thanked: 8,161 times |
Joined on Feb 2013
@ From my Gabriola Island hermitage, near the Edge of the World
|
#409
|
|
2016-04-13
, 16:44
|
Posts: 1,873 |
Thanked: 4,529 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ North Potomac MD
|
#410
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mscion For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
'smarvelous, 'swonderful, latest, not greatest |
|
Some facts; Any iPhone can be opened, it just takes some time and you need to physically have the device in your possession. Of course both Apple and the feds know this.
Now both parties also have nothing against the popular belief that the devices are non-hackable; Apple wants to promote their devices and FBI has nothing against people believing that their phones are secure.
The FBI's real agenda is to get Apple to install such a backdoor into their devices that opening can be done really quick, with just a moments covert access to the device or preferably if it could be done by remote connection.