Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Nathraiben's Avatar
Posts: 267 | Thanked: 408 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Austria
#421
Originally Posted by ndi View Post
Not if you're doing it wrong. If you expect to get rich from such an app and start a business, no. But let's not forget, people get nice cash out of an app for 40$ phones, you're preaching to 600E.

Write something people actually will use, something cool, and they will come. Get yourself a Paypal account, so people can purchase/donate by mail, safely. Don't go through OVI that starts you off in the negative, than makes it hard for half of Europe to buy.

Think. What do I want from this app? Am I ready to waste a week's worth of evenings for 40$? Do I want the local prestige? Fine, write. Want to get 4 grand? You shouldn't be here.

Ovi's most downloaded is paid. Also, among most platforms, most downloaded apps are paid. Money isn't the problem.

Ovi has exposure for S60, where you browse. N900 has repos, and there's nothing keeping you from distributing a demo, or even a full version and ask for donations.

[cut]

I agree with you, technically. Ovi's solution is for mature markets. But there are alternatives, use them.
YES! That's exactly what we need! Positive examples! Show them potential developers that there ARE alternatives out there. Get them to realise that, while probably not enough to support you, you can earn some fine pocket money by developing for the N900.

Spread it!

And don't start that DRM thing again. The torrents and DC and whatnot are full, FULL with cracked S60 apps and that hasn't exactly killed the business. People who go browsing for cracked versions aren't people who are willing to pay.
Just making sure that this was meant for the general reader, not in direct response to me, for then you would be preaching to the choir. I'm one of the most avid DRM enemies on these forums...

I disagree. While I do support and encourage some developers who wrote some stuff, some of it is ... well, not exactly thanks magnet.

Just because you wrote software doesn't entitle you to prestige. And if you think that you gain respect by just dumping code in an app, you don't understand how prestige works.

Prestige is won, earned, gained. If you are looking for prestige, write something WE want. Ask around, encourage ideas, add options when people like/dislike, instead of simple minded, simple implementation, I-decide-what's-best-for-you, it's-a-port-so-ask-the-developer, I-do-this-for-free-you-owe-me.

How many of the apps here are just straight recompiles? How many are two-liners? How many are write-and-abandon? This isn't how prestige is gained.

Maemo isn't a small obscure platform. It might not be as widely used as others, but still, it's Nokia's best thus far and has the potential for fame.

Some of the developers here have gained quite a few points on Google, and add this platform under their belt. I strongly believe that useful, maintained apps do add to karma.

Bottom line is, prestige is earned, and hard. The good news is, it comes naturally, and a few nay-sayers will not drown the thanks.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to say that everybody who writes a line of code and uploads it to the repositories is entitled to anything.
(Though neither the number of lines, nor the complexity nor whether it's new software or recompiled one really matters - what's important in the end is whether it's useful for the customer.)

Nobody wants to be thanked just because it's free, regardless of the quality of an app - constructive criticism to a product is always welcome, and I know few "serious" developers who don't appreciate it.

But there's a fine line between criticism and flaming someone for being "tha worst dev eva so stop wastin repos space with ya ****". And the most harmful thing is generalising free software as "junk by definition" - imagine you're a new developer bracing yourself to release something for this platform and then you read that people think that (no matter how much effort is put into your project) it's going to be junk because it's free...

Also, they are right. What do you expect from one-man apps? How many great apps are one-man on other platforms? How many games that sell over 10.000 copies are not the product of a team? It might not be the best encouragement, but it's true. User opinions are part of public development. How else would this work? Developer releases 0.1, everyone is in awe, we all agree it's perfect and just leave it like that, there's no need to ever improve.
We have quite a few great applications in the repositories that were made by a single developer, and look at some of the top apps on other mobile platforms: Most of them have a development team of no more than two or three members.

We're not talking about PC games here, but mobile applications, which do pretty well with 1-3 developers.

And who ever talked about not listening to the opinions of the users? Just because there are a handful of quite vocal flamers out there who love to bash projects that doesn't mean that everybody thinks that one-man-applications are junk.

Actually, the less members are in a project team, the higher the probability that the team will LISTEN to user opinions. Look at all the "what do you want for the next release" threads out there, most of which are made by single developers.

Many developers have asked for help from people who don't write for Linux, asked for beta testers, icons, graphics, advice. They generally get them.
I don't remember posting that developers don't get help in this community...

What I wrote was:

Developers get thanks, karma, help, whatever - thus the fuzzy feelings.

Developers get flames, generalisations, and are greeted by "piss off" - thus the disappearance of the fuzzy feelings.

Really? You think that's why there are 5 users? No, there are five users because it's a LOT easier to put together a script that parses a web page and call that an app, than actually doing development.

Sharing addons for local sites, re-re-reimplementations of "simple" browsers, clients, stuff that is either redundant or limited, per-city-only apps, all these have low user base.

You can't have tons of users when you list the program of a city's bus. Not that there's anything wrong witch such an app, great work, but that's really a 5-user app. So are per-site apps, where you need an account. These typically drag, have no testers to be promoted, and either die out or take forever.

I don't think general, useful apps have a userbase problem. Maemo mapper has over one hundred thousand downloads. mplayer and OpenSSH over fifty.

There are quite a few with over 10K (56).
Please read again. I did not say there are only 5 users. I explicitly stated that we have a LOT of users out there and that a LOT of users are appreciating the efforts put into developing good applications.

But thanks to all this talk about how maemo was dead developers who just joined this community THINK that there are no users out there, and that's exactly the problem. WE make them believe it's not worth developing for maemo even though it IS.

And frankly, what difference does it make? You have a great idea, know how to do it, can do it, but won't because not enough people will learn of your greatness?
Why do you care about why a developer is doing what he's doing? Does someone who does it for spreading the word about "his greatness" develop sub-par applications because of it?

There are more than enough GREAT developers out there who do it for the kick of getting know. Heck, developers being egomaniacs is one of the big IT clichés!

Oh, how easy it is to blame the community.
Easier than blaming Nokia?

No money, because community is cheap. No prestige, because community stinks. No fans, because community is small. Heck, you'd think if we had a good app we'd bury it just to be behinds about it.

If you build it, they will come. If it's useful, they will download and install it. If it's really good, they'll pay. Everyone else does. All platforms started SOMEWHERE. It's definitely not impossible. It's definitely hard.

I don't see Wikipedia gasping for air. I don't see chat forums dead. Because they are useful, we want them up and running, and we give what we can. What makes you think this works everywhere else but here?

And the true beauty of it is this: it's hard work, low pay, thankless job. You know, just like everywhere else. Or do you think that developing for iPhone is easy? Or that it's a one-man job? Or that it gets you instant-fame among other half-a-million apps? If anything, you get a lot more exposure here if you want fame, a lot less competition if you want to sell, and it's a lot easier knowing where that bar is now.
Again, please re-read my post. I posted what a developers SEES when he's new to maemo and the reasons that throw off potential new developers.

The problem of this community is not that there's no support for developers. It's not that there's no userbase. It's not that there's nothing to be gained from working on maemo applications.

There's LOTS of support, MANY people who would use a good application, MORE THAN ENOUGH money, fame, exposure to be gained.

But WE AS A COMMUNITY make it LOOK like this is a dead platform inhabited by a mere handful of ungrateful zombies. And that image is what we have to fight in order to attract new developers.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Nathraiben For This Useful Post:
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#422
I never said you had to agree, but you also dismiss my opinions as invalid enough to tell me to go away. The discussion isn't yours alone to tell me to go away. If I take offense, it's because of your posturing. Argue away, otherwise. I'm not above being deprecated (even self-deprecating) except when you pretend you aren't and when you tell me I should begone altogether. :P That's not being on my side, despite any agreement on the topics.

Anyway, this isn't a Nokia forum--but it WAS the ITT and it IS the Maemo forum. Prey tell, what devices DO we run Maemo on? What do YOU run it on?

I disagree about the topic of constructive criticism. Despite the fact that there ARE Nokia folks who DO go through here and read, why would you want to stop any of the debates and rants? Whether or not Nokia pays attention, knowing that this is the Maemo community's forum, is just as much an important point as anything else that goes on here. If they never bother to read and consider the things said in the forums says just as much about what they think of the community itself. This probably shouldn't be the ONLY barometric to customers and developers, but it should speak volumes.

Originally Posted by Nathraiben View Post
Seems like you really want the community to die so you can point fingers at Nokia...
I thought I was relentlessly pointing out that the community and customers should be supported better by Nokia. You're a terrible mind reader.

I'm clearly pointing out that Nokia would be much better served by getting OUT of the operating system, letting the community handle that and let it flourish on its own and get back to the business of crusading for more open-source friendly hardware and providing developers with what they want so that customers can get what they want. If pointing out these issues drives developers away, it might be for a good reason. In an analogy, you can till and plant your seeds--but you're very unlikely to get a good harvest unless you nurture what you've planted.

Originally Posted by Nathraiben View Post
Nothing to do with developers. Or, rather, even more reason we need developers, because other than that "crippling closed-source" (which is such a small part that few developers will ever hit those boundaries) it's the community that can fix your crippled user experience.
What's with all those Fixed in Fremantle and WONTFIXES and other various bugs that I'm still living with? Know any Maemo developers that can fix it outside of Nokia? (Hell, even INSIDE Nokia?) How do you suggest anything will get fixed on my device by bringing on developers while the OS is riddled with closed dependencies and drivers?

Originally Posted by Nathraiben View Post
But you're rather intent on getting rid of community developers - just so you can say "Ha, see - I told you!"???
So, I'm here because I wanted to be able to wait out two years and several Nokia purchases to tell you I predicted how it would go badly? Uhhh. heh. No. Like I said, you're awful at this mind reading games. That's alright, most people aren't. Neither am I. So, what are you doing here? Trying to attract developers? How are you doing it? How's it going so far?

Originally Posted by Nathraiben View Post
Then what are you still doing here? MeeGo has it's own community - so no reason to stay with something that's dead, right?
I'm there. I've read stuff and I've maybe commented once on something. I just not much to say yet. It's not like there's anything for me to try on my N800. I'm cynical about it right now, but I have a small sliver of hope for it yet and I'm hesitant to complain about anything if I can't even use it. Dead or not, where else would you recommend I hang around if I'm on an N800 running Maemo, other than maemo.org--At least until I see MeeGo running on it (or another device I might want).

Originally Posted by Nathraiben View Post
And what exactly has THAT to do with application developers? Take those complaints to Nokia, get rid of the device, get something else. No reason to tell developers to stay away from this community just because of your bad experiences with customer support.
You've clearly not followed my comments enough to read that although I think my Motorola Droid is an EXCELLENT phone, the N800 (and even N900) are far more suitable little computers. It's shameful that Nokia took an excellent, relatively rare market that they pioneered and ruined it. Pointing that out isn't the same as telling developers to stay away. It IS pointing out the shortcomings--something that Nokia and Maemo could fix. Complaining to Nokia has done very little and Maemo is tied to Nokia's devices if you intend to run the OS in any meaningful way.

Why are you taking it so personally that people have complaints about this platform? And why are you insisting that they should withhold pointing out their experiences with using Maemo on Nokia hardware?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post:
Nathraiben's Avatar
Posts: 267 | Thanked: 408 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Austria
#423
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
I never said you had to agree, but you also dismiss my opinions as invalid enough to tell me to go away.
Yep, right, I did. No reason to read on if that's how you want to see it. Have a nice day.
 
qwazix's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 2,622 | Thanked: 5,447 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#424
Comparing android market, iOS app store and the maemo extras I have reached the following conclusion. There are a million apps for the android and iOS but the quality of a great percentage of those apps is below average. And i don't mean the graphics. I mean the actual usefulness. If i carry a 160 gram brick in my pocket I want it to almost replace my netbook. As stated in the adobe website only the nexus one is capable of full flash. I couldn't find a decent ftp app for the iOS. Almost all of the free apps in both market and app store are merely stripped down or demos of a paid app. On the contrary each time I check extras I find one or two new apps that are really useful. For most of them there are no alternatives in other platforms. And they are all free. No disabled features no ads nothing. No other device has a full spreadsheet app, even office mobile for wm is poor compared to gnumeric. Mypaint is something you can find in no mobile device. All major browsers can be run on maemo. It is not perfect, I am sure more apps can come (eg the gimp) but let's stop asking for just a bigger number of apps. I wouldn't like the money making noise of the app store, all that crap that hides away the really useful stuff. Let's keep the quality up, focus on migrating the existing apps to meego or ubuntu mobile (because inevitably maemo is going to fade away).
________
Milana cam

Last edited by qwazix; 2011-08-21 at 10:39.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to qwazix For This Useful Post:
Posts: 92 | Thanked: 6 times | Joined on Jul 2010
#425
it has been months already, i hope nokia won't abondon this just like what they did with the ngage
 

The Following User Says Thank You to bewrong For This Useful Post:
daperl's Avatar
Posts: 2,427 | Thanked: 2,986 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#426
For The Gimp, try Easy Debian.
__________________
N9: Go white or go home
 
ndi's Avatar
Posts: 2,050 | Thanked: 1,425 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Bucharest
#427
Originally Posted by Nathraiben View Post
Just making sure that this was meant for the general reader, not in direct response to me, for then you would be preaching to the choir. I'm one of the most avid DRM enemies on these forums...
Most is. I usually tag my replies with the usual language barrier waning, but sometimes I forget. It's a forum, though, so all discussion is open.

Originally Posted by Nathraiben View Post
Though neither the number of lines, nor the complexity nor whether it's new software or recompiled one really matters - what's important in the end is whether it's useful for the customer.
You shouldn't fall back on minority examples when the majority doesn't agree with theory. 99% of apps that are any good are quite a lot of work, mainly because if it would be easy, they'd already be out there.

If it's good, odds are overwhelming there's a lot of work into it.

Originally Posted by Nathraiben View Post
But there's a fine line between criticism and flaming someone for being "tha worst dev eva so stop wastin repos space with ya ****". And the most harmful thing is generalising free software as "junk by definition" - imagine you're a new developer bracing yourself to release something for this platform and then you read that people think that (no matter how much effort is put into your project) it's going to be junk because it's free...
Again with the minority. The vast majority of this forum, and of this community is not made of whining, cry-babies with an attitude made of 50% "I am the toughest and best" and 50% "stop making me cry".

And if a few idiots throw insults out there when unfounded then:

a) this is the job for the mods, feel free to report posts.
b) as a developer, if your day is ruined by one dolt versus 99 who appreciate you, then you shouldn't be signing your app.

Idiots aren't numbers, they are percentages. And as a community grows, be it the Maemo, Nokia or your app's user base, sooner or later that percentage will become more that one person.

You have to have SOME resistance to this. Don't sign the app, only take bug reports, I don't know. And frankly, don't really care, either, because from the user's point of view there is no distinction between "I'm insulted, no version for you" and "I'm a behind, no version for you". Or "I have to lie in my bug report and say that it's not really a collection of bugs so I don't upset the developer".

Now, if it's not true, then, again, it is the job of the moderator to slim down flaming. But if it's true, then it's feedback. We're a community, not a funhouse mirror.

Originally Posted by Nathraiben View Post
We have quite a few great applications in the repositories [...] Most of them have a development team of no more than two or three members.[...] which do pretty well with 1-3 developers.
All right, another fall to minority fallacy. Yes a few have a few developers. but let's be fair. How many of the top, selling or not, free or not, most downloaded, most whatever you want are one man shows? One in 10? One in 20?

You see, just because one man has made one good app, it does not mean that good apps don't require teams. Also, when making an argument, it doesn't help if you fall back from one man to one or two, then 1-3.

3 is a team, where one or two write code, checking each other, another does graphics, and the supplement each other's limitations.

Team efforts are like getting 3 good apps and melding the best look with the best functionality and the best stability. It's just not the same.

And, since you are so fond of opening new ideas for the developers, like they can't see them just fine, then ask for help. Like I said, allow skinning, allow translations, align yourself to localization via text files anyone can edit.

That, however, requires more work.

Also, most of what we want is games, fun apps, work apps. These require finishing. Sore a few could be one-man shows, and they are, but the things we want most badly are not. Sure we want VNC ported, SSH, etc. These can be simple ports. But Office isn't really a one-nighter, let's face facts.

Originally Posted by Nathraiben View Post
Just because there are a handful of quite vocal flamers out there who love to bash projects that doesn't mean that everybody thinks that one-man-applications are junk.
Boy do you love exaggerations. Not everyone thinks one-man-shows are junk. But most of us know that one-man shows don't have the resources of team efforts, especially larger teams, especially commercial larger teams, and, thus, large scale projects are superior.

I have no better word for it. Do you? If I write a quick Python web server that serves a single page, and compare it to Apache HTTP server, how would qualify my project? Superior? Just as good?

Insulting is one thing. Outright lying is another. I will not lie to the developer.

Originally Posted by Nathraiben View Post
Actually, the less members are in a project team, the higher the probability that the team will LISTEN to user opinions.
Where did you get that, anti-trust weekly? How about Mozilla? Have you looked at the options and extensions on that baby? Apache? Postgres?

I've deleted my previous answer because, frankly, a whole load of examples isn't going to do any good to people who don't use that much commercial software. Point of it was, if you are deaf to user requests, you are going down, and it's not like someone will take over the project. In commercial land, you lose money and start firing people.

You have an example right here. Nokia.

Originally Posted by Nathraiben View Post
I don't remember posting that developers don't get help in this community...
That segment is from the one-man apps and why that is, not in the thanks part of my post.

Originally Posted by Nathraiben View Post
Please read again. I did not say there are only 5 users.
I did, you placed that opinion in the minds of developers, then proceeded to take a stance as if that were true. Moreover, you think that developers think they have 5 users because of the rest of us.

Any developer that deduces the range of a market by the opinion of 5 idiots on this forum has a problem. Especially when there's a list of projects sorted by downloads.

That is no more than a blame shift. That's akin to saying transportation companies don't work because Trucker Dave said transports stink. Market dynamics don't work based on trolls.

Originally Posted by Nathraiben View Post
Why do you care about why a developer is doing what he's doing?
I don't.

Originally Posted by Nathraiben View Post
There are more than enough GREAT developers out there who do it for the kick of getting know. Heck, developers being egomaniacs is one of the big IT clichés!
Please don't extend your opinion over them. As a developer, I take offense in that. I have several software out there signed by alias, with no link back to me. If it's free, then it's free. Some of the apps I really, really like and where effort has been put don't even have an about box.

There are some who don't have the concept of free, something for nothing. These people need to be rewarded, and if nothing tangible comes back their way then at least fame they can (maybe) cash later.

I understand their desire to get something back, ESPECIALLY if it's not a simple project. But from here to "all developers are egomaniacs" is a great leap, and one that is false.

Not everyone is an egomaniac. Some of us are cheap.

Well, I kid, but the fact remains that not everyone does this in exchange for something.

Case in point, I have 9 apps I would pay for, given a reasonable price. Out of those, 2 are can't-profit ports, 5 don't take donations (some even after being asked) and 2 have taken to OVI and refuse to sell through other channels.

Originally Posted by Nathraiben View Post
Again, please re-read my post. I posted what a developers SEES when he's new to maemo and the reasons that throw off potential new developers.
The problem with new developers, Nathraiben, is lack of documentation, lack of examples, short OS lifespan, together with no backwards compatibility.

The problem with new developers is that there's a steep entry curve for people who want to do something other than a simple widget, and by the time anyone actually gets to know the OS and really develop it'll be dead.

That's why some of us say it's stillborn.

Originally Posted by Nathraiben View Post
But WE AS A COMMUNITY make it LOOK like this is a dead platform inhabited by a mere handful of ungrateful zombies. And that image is what we have to fight in order to attract new developers.
We make it LOOK like dead? Didn't you watch the news? Check the pulse. Maemo is dead, it has been abandoned, whatever useful code has been merged into MeeGo.

What do you propose, jam a stick up its corpse, put a little makeup, some deodorant, some strings and pretend it's kicking?

Some of the apps that were written for Maemo will work on MeeGo. But Maemo 5 IS dead, as it was only installed on one device, N900, and of those a lot will upgrade to the next OS, even more to the next phone. In less than a year, this OS version and its hardware is going to be less widespread than Sinclair Spectrum.

Once Qt Mobility is here, apps will be made cross-platform (ish), and we can finally upgrade without renouncing out beloved apps (ish).

One must not mistake a platform that still runs on some devices with a platform that actually has a future. M5 will run for a few years, until the last N900/M5 bites the dust. So will this forum.

Developers don't come to platforms that run, but to platform that WILL run.

And finally, the thread is why N900 is lacking in OVI store and Extras, not extras-devel. The reason that is is this:

* OVI sucks
* OVI doesn't take a whole load of cards/payment methods
* OVI is beta
* OVI starts you off in the negative
* OVI has approval to enter, but has no disapproval for bad apps.

And as long as the commercial part of the app mechanics is busted, you are reduced to begging. Sure, some free stuff is nice and wide, but they have amassed their awsomeness through years, some through decades.

Firefox started 2003 (7 years), standing on Mozilla's shoulders, standing on Gecko's. Apache started 1996 (14 years). PostgreSQL prototyped in 1988, released in 1989 (21 years). Qt is being developed since 1991, commercially.

Open Office took 10 years to get where it is, in spite of the fact that it's free office, the wet dream of every company out there, runs on who-knows-how-many-platforms, has 110 languages, and is a walking commercial for the Oracle Open Office, 100$ a pop, with a minimum order of 100 pieces. So it is, indirectly, commercially driven by damn Oracle and Sun.

(Oh, and, the fact that they support .doc was a plus, but the fact that MS Office and Windows 7 now support OD* is even better. Not everyone has that kind of stuff going for them)

We don't have that long. M5 was out in November. Until December there were virtually no users. Jan-June, that 6 months, out of which 2 had Qt locked/help back, more had optification issues, so, basically, we're a few months old.

Oh, and, out of those 3-4 months, 2 we spent after they announced M5 is dead, long live MeeGo (Feb 2010).

That's why there are no apps in OVI and Extras. Not because User #234 commented while being upset.
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.

Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ndi For This Useful Post:
ndi's Avatar
Posts: 2,050 | Thanked: 1,425 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Bucharest
#428
Originally Posted by daperl View Post
For The Gimp, try Easy Debian.
I did, and I also like Ice Weasel, and OOo, but they are quite slow, quite large, take a minute to start and some crash because they are basically hacked into the N900.

They don't replace actual N900/Maemo apps. For example, Ice Weasel crashes on flash, OOo has some options that ram it into the ground, some dialogs don't fit, so there's the options you can never toggle problem. On the plus side, real addons!

A very good aid, but not the answer.

@qwazix

Oh, you mean like vuvuzela, moobox, candle, etc?

Heh.

Anyway, some platform has mostly free stuff, but few apps, another has a truckload, but most cost. I don't see this as a no-brainer.

Besides, they don't have MyPaint because it's a Linux app, but they have equivalents. Also, they have FTP, as well a SSH, VNC, VPN. Not exactly poor.

So does WM.

As for office, WM has it, iPhone has it. Android is a Linux OS, so it has the same issues as us, but they are Google-based, so I'm guessing online editing comes natural.

While I agree that asking for quantity is wrong, let's be fair, it's not like they have all-quantity-and-no-quality.
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.

Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ndi For This Useful Post:
Posts: 98 | Thanked: 15 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#429
WoW! Lots of Essays... Nice essays..

N900 + Community = Living
N900 - Community = Dead
__________________
The Devil that is an Angel ... WTF???
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aldevil For This Useful Post:
Posts: 90 | Thanked: 15 times | Joined on Jul 2010 @ Bangkok
#430
Originally Posted by aldevil View Post
WoW! Lots of Essays... Nice essays..

N900 + Community = Living
N900 - Community = Dead

N900 + Community - Nokia Support = ?
N900 + ( MeeGo - Community ) = dead
 

The Following User Says Thank You to gixx For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
applications, apps, fart apps, free apps, fremantle, maemo, maemo 5, more apps, ovi, ovi store, pay apps, software


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:39.