Active Topics

 


Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#421
The council may not be able to answer this directly, but they could perhaps try to push the bug report forward.

AIUI Nokia are still paying for one full-time person for maemo.org maintenance, so not even having a response after 7 weeks seems a bit sub-optimal :-(
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2,154 | Thanked: 8,464 times | Joined on May 2010
#422
Ok, now X-Fade on #maemo found problem. See:
http://mg.pov.lt/maemo-irclog/%23mae...08-11T10:37:42

Now I can try to fix it.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pali For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2,154 | Thanked: 8,464 times | Joined on May 2010
#423
@Estel:
Problem was that, v47 overwrited tarball of v46. It had other md5sum and this was reason why v47 was rejected. It has really nothing with SDK package kernel.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pali For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,074 | Thanked: 12,964 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria
#424
@Pali: Seriously, please, don't use orig tarball from outside maemo.org. All the development/patches so far are against what Nokia has put in repos, not against the one on kernel.org. And it is obviously they don't match, it is not only checksum, kp48 patches from your git repo does not apply against .orig in maemo repos.

I think you can get correct(stock) .orig tarball one from here
http://repository.maemo.org/pool/fre...free/k/kernel/
 

The Following User Says Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2,154 | Thanked: 8,464 times | Joined on May 2010
#425
The only problem is with md5sum. See IRC log. (And continue talking in other thread, this is "Ask the council")
 
Posts: 673 | Thanked: 856 times | Joined on Mar 2006
#426
Originally Posted by lma View Post
The council may not be able to answer this directly, but they could perhaps try to push the bug report forward.

AIUI Nokia are still paying for one full-time person for maemo.org maintenance, so not even having a response after 7 weeks seems a bit sub-optimal :-(
Ima is that council meeting with nokia SD69 was talking about?
 
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#427
No, that was last year (check the date in the URL & title).
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post:
Posts: 673 | Thanked: 856 times | Joined on Mar 2006
#428
Originally Posted by lma View Post
No, that was last year (check the date in the URL & title).
My mistake, was checking date on pali's chat.
 
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#429
Going through Marius' IRC logs, it appears the meeting was here. The highlight IMHO is

X-Fade In reality, the servers will stay on until 31-12-2012. 18:25
X-Fade After that a redirect is about the best you can bet on. 18:25
which is a good 6 months longer than I thought we had :-)
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post:
Jaffa's Avatar
Posts: 2,535 | Thanked: 6,681 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ UK
#430
Originally Posted by lma View Post
Going through Marius' IRC logs, it appears the meeting was here.
Dear Council,

I find it very disappointing that this meeting wasn't pre-announced for wider community participation. Ironic that the discussion about changing the scope of the Council and the meaning of maemo.org to a more open and formal entity was happening in relative secret.

(Finally) changes to the voting structure are happening. There's been lots of discussion on maemo-developers & -community about the limits and process changes which would be appropriate; but it seems that in the meeting SD69 & X-Fade were basically plucking figures from the air without any prior discussion or consensus?

Comments appreciated. TIA.
__________________
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread

Tags
council


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:57.