Poll: Do you think its possible to overclock the N900?!
Poll Options
Do you think its possible to overclock the N900?!

Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 2 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#4291
Originally Posted by james8110 View Post
hi jak, i many command thru xterminal and sudo enabled. but end message always " you don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
cannot uninstall program too
please help me
 
Posts: 3,664 | Thanked: 1,530 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Hamilton, New Zealand
#4292
Which kernal has the lowest risk of reducing the life span of the CPU and less chance of frying the CPU and stable?

I am looking for minimum at 125Mhz, maximum 800Mhz.
Any suggestion?
 
Posts: 284 | Thanked: 320 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Peterborough, UK
#4293
Is there any way to use avoid_frequencies with the conservative governor? I have modified the kernel-config script to handle sampling_down_factor, freq_step and down_threshold but have so far hit a brick wall when it comes to leaving out 250 and 950Mhz. I think the file is created within the kernel itself when running ondemand governor as even as root in xterm, it doesn't work if I try within the conservative cpufreq directory.
 
Parlapipas's Avatar
Posts: 223 | Thanked: 135 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Wish I was in Greece
#4294
Originally Posted by titan View Post
Three more positive votes are required for the promotion of kernel-power-settings to extras
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...settings/0.11/
Please follow the QA checklist http://wiki.maemo.org/Extras-testing/QA_Checklist for voting.
Done.........although it seems like half a dozen people beat me to it
 
Posts: 221 | Thanked: 51 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Germany
#4295
@titan - really happy with your kernel - BUT (now having an iPad) using JoikuSpot (always typing "modprobe JoikuSpot_Bouncer" & "modprobe -r JoikuSpot_Bouncer") drives me a bit crazy.
So anything you can do about this - cause it seems to work just fine using the stock (also PR1.2) kernel... any plans here?
 
hawaii's Avatar
Posts: 1,030 | Thanked: 792 times | Joined on Jun 2009
#4296
Add the module into /etc/modules or create an upstart script that does it for you.
 
Posts: 9 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#4297
I currently updated my device to PR1.2 and i reinstalled enhanced power settings and OCed my device to my preferred clocks.. everything seems to work great except my device seems to only use 125mhz 500mhz and 750mhz.. I belive before the update the device seemed to use all the frequencies between 125-750mhz...

here is my 24/7 settings..

15# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - CREATE A COPY OF IT FOR CUSTOMIZATION
# minimum frequency to use
MINFREQ=125
# maximum frequency to use
MAXFREQ=750
# list of frequency configurations: each "frequency:volt,dsprate"
FREQS="0:20,90 125:25,90 250:25,180 500:30,360 550:33,400 600:38,430 700:45,430 750:45,430 805:48,430 850:48,500 900:54,500 950:54,500 1000:60,500 1100:72,520 1150:72,520"
UP_THRESHOLD=75
SAMPLING_RATE=150000
SMARTREFLEX_VDD1=0
SMARTREFLEX_VDD2=0
IGNORE_NICE_LOAD=0

Please let me know if i am missing anything here.. thanks..

Last edited by suphiceto; 2010-05-31 at 17:43.
 
Posts: 254 | Thanked: 95 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ New Delhi, India
#4298
Originally Posted by navsin View Post
I have asked this earlier too.... I'm running v36 with PR 1.2 on ideal settings 500 - 850. The problem is when I use the phone app, the lower limit of the frequency automatically changes to 125 even though avoid frequencies still mention 125 and 250. I want to avoid this change in the lower freq.... Please help.
Someone please help me with this one.... I haven't come across any solution.
 
Posts: 946 | Thanked: 1,650 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Germany
#4299
Originally Posted by navsin View Post
Someone please help me with this one.... I haven't come across any solution.
there is no solution but only a builtin workaround
http://wiki.maemo.org/Overclocking#A...tion_and_hints
 

The Following User Says Thank You to titan For This Useful Post:
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#4300
Originally Posted by maxximuscool View Post
Which kernal has the lowest risk of reducing the life span of the CPU and less chance of frying the CPU and stable?

I am looking for minimum at 125Mhz, maximum 800Mhz.
Any suggestion?
The most recent Titan Kernel.
 
Reply

Tags
cooking on gas, cortex-a8, faster, first to fry it wins!, hardware, its smoking, n900, need for speed, need for weed, nos, omap, omap3, omap3430, overclock, overclocking, soc, system-on-a-chip, the dogs, this thread got good!, vtec just kicked in y0!, warranty will be void, whooplah, zoom zoom


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:05.