The Following User Says Thank You to flydeep For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-12
, 16:58
|
|
Posts: 270 |
Thanked: 170 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Atlanta, GA + Oxford UK
|
#442
|
I can tell you they have.
But I can also assert that denying this under warranty is wrong. Maybe CARE ops have not all received the info. I will stay on this.
|
2010-02-12
, 17:01
|
|
Posts: 963 |
Thanked: 626 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Connecticut, USA
|
#443
|
All of this seems like a Xbox's ring of death debacle all over again. Can't these big companies learn how to deal with a bad design early on and give their customers the confidence? No one is perfect but how you deal with an uncomfortable situation is what counts.
I need to be on their board of directors to bring better reputation to the company
|
2010-02-12
, 17:02
|
|
Posts: 270 |
Thanked: 170 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Atlanta, GA + Oxford UK
|
#444
|
So does that mean everyone who has a little wiggle in their phones should send their's right NOW to NOKIA to fix them? We can jump ahead and ask the bad design to fixed, everyone needs a fix
The Following User Says Thank You to HumanPenguin For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-12
, 17:02
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#445
|
Mark, a little update.
One victim of this issue (with a brand new device!) reports the following today:
"I just got out of the Nokia care center. They confirmed that they had recived an update on the issue today.
It states that if the pads have been removed from the board they should not repair it under warranty."
He was denied proper service based on that.
I need to make something clear on this: the amount of force that *should* be necessary to shear off copper lands (traces, pads, etc) would be severe enough to result in damage to other areas. If user abuse was in any involved, you would see other examples (extreme distortion of the connector, damage to housing, etc). The fact that the lands are shearing without any collateral damage is a strong indicator that the problem lies with their (poor) bond to the PCB surface. If users were responsible, you might see something like needle-nose plier marks on the connector, or a gouge around the housing opening.
Merely removing a male plug should not result in this catastrophic failure. But it is. And it is in no way a user fault.
Normally it would take someone disassembling a device and deliberately prying the connector off to cause this degree of damage. The evidence shows this is not the case (and unlikely anyway). Shear should simply not be occurring so easily as it is. In over 20 years experience with PCB design and manufacturing I have never seen such a thing-- but then, in every design I've been involved with such connectors were through-hole mounted and would be highly unlikely to even budge eevn with user abuse.
Hopefully the communication above was in error, but I am concerned that the "evidence of rough handling" disclaimer *may* be improperly applied...
|
2010-02-12
, 17:03
|
|
Posts: 2,121 |
Thanked: 1,540 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Oxford, UK
|
#446
|
The Following User Says Thank You to pelago For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-12
, 17:18
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#447
|
|
2010-02-12
, 17:23
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#448
|
|
2010-02-12
, 17:24
|
|
Posts: 547 |
Thanked: 461 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ UK
|
#449
|
|
2010-02-12
, 17:26
|
|
Posts: 311 |
Thanked: 180 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ London
|
#450
|
Mark, a little update.
One victim of this issue (with a brand new device!) reports the following today:
"I just got out of the Nokia care center. They confirmed that they had recived an update on the issue today.
It states that if the pads have been removed from the board they should not repair it under warranty."
He was denied proper service based on that.
I need to make something clear on this: the amount of force that *should* be necessary to shear off copper lands (traces, pads, etc) would be severe enough to result in damage to other areas. If user abuse was in any involved, you would see other examples (extreme distortion of the connector, damage to housing, etc). The fact that the lands are shearing without any collateral damage is a strong indicator that the problem lies with their (poor) bond to the PCB surface. If users were responsible, you might see something like needle-nose plier marks on the connector, or a gouge around the housing opening.
Merely removing a male plug should not result in this catastrophic failure. But it is. And it is in no way a user fault.
Normally it would take someone disassembling a device and deliberately prying the connector off to cause this degree of damage. The evidence shows this is not the case (and unlikely anyway). Shear should simply not be occurring so easily as it is. In over 20 years experience with PCB design and manufacturing I have never seen such a thing-- but then, in every design I've been involved with such connectors were through-hole mounted and would be highly unlikely to even budge eevn with user abuse.
Hopefully the communication above was in error, but I am concerned that the "evidence of rough handling" disclaimer *may* be improperly applied...
The Following User Says Thank You to Haus3r For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
bad design, broken, charging, failure, hardware, loose, microusb, microusb port, n900, nokia, part, port, repair, return, surface mount, usb, usb port, warranty |
|
I need to be on their board of directors to bring better reputation to the company