|
2011-08-04
, 08:24
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#442
|
Apple has managed to clinch the number one position in the Q2 global smartphone market as Nokia's shipments declined to 16.7 million units, down from 24.2 million in the previous quarter.Source: http://www.tgdaily.com/mobility-feat...in-apples-gain
According to IHS, Nokia posted the "worst performance" amongst leading smartphone brands in Q2 2011 as it faced fierce competition from Apple, Samsung and HTC.
"With the announcement of the transition in early 2011, Nokia eliminated any incentive for consumers and developers to buy into its existing smartphone products, which are based on its Symbian and MeeGo operating systems," said Teng.
All the old reasons a WP7 commitment was a bad idea remain problems under the new order. WP7 has bombed in its first quarter; there’s actual evidence that it’s not competitive. This means that the alliance does nothing to address Nokia’s historic weakness in the North American market. Then, too, it’s going to take time to get WP7 to market on Nokia hardware; one of their press releases describes 2011 and 2012 as “transition years”, a pretty strong hint that Nokia thinks both business units will have to struggle through a valley of death and shrinking Symbian sales before the new plan starts to bear fruit.Source: http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=2931
(Would an Android port take less time? Yes. Judging by current product cycle times for Android handsets, port time for the handset makers has to be bounded above by 90 days. My bet is that Android port time is actually down to two weeks and change. History matters; the Android codebase is designed to be ported in ways Microsoft is probably culturally incapable of even imagining.)
|
2011-08-04
, 12:08
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#443
|
Nokia CEO once said that "using Android is like peeing in your pants for warmth" (not Elop, though).
How WP7 is any different?
|
2011-08-04
, 12:57
|
Posts: 523 |
Thanked: 292 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#444
|
Android was peeing in pants because it'd give Nokia a short term benefit but long term negative because they'd switch to an OS where they had no real influence.
WP7 is pouring gasoline on the platform you stand, then lighting fire on it without having a rescue boat ready. Nokia realized their boat were sinking some time in the future so they bombed it, throwing passengers and sailors alike into the cold waters, with no hope for short term rescue. And again, they'd switch to an OS where they had no real influence.
That's how WP7 is different.
Bounced up from a new low at $ 5.28 today.
|
2011-08-04
, 13:19
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#445
|
|
2011-08-04
, 13:37
|
Posts: 572 |
Thanked: 259 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
|
#446
|
So you will not buy a phone based on S40 even if it's the same ux on top as N9, just because it's based on "S40"??????
Latest S40 are going to be far from S40 phones with qt implemented. It will be a whole new ball game my friend.
|
2011-08-04
, 14:02
|
Posts: 93 |
Thanked: 88 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#447
|
|
2011-08-04
, 14:12
|
|
Posts: 963 |
Thanked: 626 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Connecticut, USA
|
#448
|
Nokia CEO once said that "using Android is like peeing in your pants for warmth" (not Elop, though).
How WP7 is any different?
|
2011-08-04
, 14:57
|
Posts: 1,096 |
Thanked: 760 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#449
|
|
2011-08-04
, 15:01
|
|
Posts: 963 |
Thanked: 626 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Connecticut, USA
|
#450
|
Depends on the licensing terms with Microsoft...but assuming they are in a much more favorable position than they would be in with using android
Tags |
goodbye nokia, investing, last quotes, lumiatard, samsung, specc=ericsson, stock, the elop flop, the flop elop, tizen |
|
Pirate Party UK - www.pirateparty.org.uk