The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jakiman For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-05-08
, 06:46
|
Posts: 64 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Petrolina, Brazil
|
#442
|
|
2011-05-08
, 06:58
|
|
Posts: 565 |
Thanked: 618 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Finland
|
#443
|
"Canīt flash kernel, required files not found.
Guru meditation #00000025.62017712
Hit any key for panic"
./flasher-3.5 -l -k zImage-2.6.28.10-power47 -b
|
2011-05-08
, 07:03
|
|
Posts: 519 |
Thanked: 123 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ Malaysia
|
#444
|
|
2011-05-08
, 07:10
|
|
Posts: 474 |
Thanked: 368 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#445
|
What is the proper way to reverse back to v46? 47 seems too hot for me, i am running at 500/1000 Mhz.
I tried to Apt-get install -reinstall kernel-power kernel-power-flasher
but I kept getting v47..
dpkg -i <kernel> dpkg -i <headers> dpkg -i <modules> dpkg -i <flasher>
reboot
|
2011-05-08
, 07:47
|
Posts: 701 |
Thanked: 585 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ London, England
|
#446
|
What is the proper way to reverse back to v46? 47 seems too hot for me, i am running at 500/1000 Mhz.
I tried to Apt-get install -reinstall kernel-power kernel-power-flasher
but I kept getting v47..
apt-get install kernel-power=2.6.28-maemo46 kernel-power-modules=2.6.28-maemo46 kernel-power-headers=2.6.28-maemo46 kernel-power-flasher=2.6.28-maemo46
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to retsaw For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-05-08
, 11:39
|
Posts: 115 |
Thanked: 342 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#447
|
|
2011-05-08
, 12:58
|
Posts: 172 |
Thanked: 63 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#448
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to shnigi For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-05-08
, 13:06
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
|
#449
|
|
2011-05-08
, 13:16
|
|
Posts: 2,142 |
Thanked: 2,054 times |
Joined on Dec 2006
@ Sicily
|
#450
|
After kernel patch my sounds bug in someplayer and grooveshark. The sound is jumping from point to point and then stops. Stock mediaplayer although works well. What happened ?
Tags |
battery-status, bq27x00_battery, kernel, kernel-power, misiak4king, noobs-cant-read, pali4president, patches, readdirections, revolverspinyou |
|
I can easily show you the difference between 600MHz stock and 1Ghz on my N900. It is faster and more responsive. Totally noticeable in many everyday tasks. Even during sliding through the desktops. (Yes, it is supposed to be GPU accelerated. But CPU is providing the "data" to the GPU and the improvement definitely can be seen by eye.)
btw, seems these CPUs in the N900 have been made with quite a good yield and specification as many can run at ~1GHz without any issues. Yes, some people go on about it reducing its lifetime etc. (which is all theory btw. If the CPU isn't stressed enough, the lifetime of the CPU is near identical.)
If we had everything identical except upgrade the CPU to some dual-core 1GHz CPU, I'll bet that N900 will suddenly feel like a whole new phone when multi-tasking and in overall snappiness (app install times, loading times etc).
JAKIMAN's ShootSpeak.com Blog Follow me on twitter
JAKIMAN's N900 Performance Tweaks / Overclocking Article
JAKIMAN's Useful tips / hacks / tricks / apps for Nokia N9
Last edited by jakiman; 2011-05-08 at 06:40.