![]() |
2012-03-29
, 19:24
|
Posts: 371 |
Thanked: 252 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#441
|
![]() |
2012-03-29
, 20:23
|
Posts: 1,163 |
Thanked: 1,873 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ The Netherlands
|
#442
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mr_pingu For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-03-29
, 21:32
|
|
Posts: 125 |
Thanked: 1,142 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Austria
|
#443
|
so guys, I'm on CSSU stable right now. Is it possible to "update" to testing somehow?
apt-get update apt-get install mp-fremantle-community-pr dsmetool -b
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to merlin1991 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-03-30
, 00:02
|
|
Posts: 1,455 |
Thanked: 3,309 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Rochester, NY
|
#444
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to woody14619 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-03-30
, 07:36
|
Posts: 1,163 |
Thanked: 1,873 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ The Netherlands
|
#445
|
---
From a technical point of view, backupmenu is used for months, and can be considered rock-stable. No matter is user is doing backups or not, it allows USB networking and SSH access, which allow to fix most problems, from noob-grade mistakes, to developers experiments.
Also, RobbieThe1st has lately become active and (slowly) working on it again, so it's not "abandoned" code. The only problem I can see so far, is making it compatible, no matter is one is using multiboot, or not (up to date, two exclusive versions exist - upstream "no backupmenu", and slightly modified one, that loads from BM). I'm pretty sure, that this can be solved by less or more ugly dependency checking, or something like that.
---
Most important thing - what CSSU devs and trusted testers/users think about it?
/Estel
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mr_pingu For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-03-30
, 07:51
|
Posts: 7 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Mar 2012
@ Dubai , United Arab Emirates
|
#446
|
![]() |
2012-03-30
, 07:54
|
Posts: 1,523 |
Thanked: 1,997 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
@ not your mom's FOSS basement
|
#447
|
If BM finally has proper implemention in BootMenu and/or Multiboot I am OK with it. Now BM uses some kind of strange bootmenu.
Besides that, isn't it possible to port backupmenu's functions easily to a shell script and then run it from Pali's recovery console(framebuffer). That's the way I would like to see it. However I won't complain or whine about it, as I lack the proper skills to do it myself. I don't think it's fair to demand everything while I can't offer much in return...
![]() |
2012-03-30
, 16:28
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#448
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-03-30
, 18:13
|
Posts: 336 |
Thanked: 129 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ portugal
|
#449
|
Agreed. A nice trick: apt-get and FAM use a different mechanism to choose which repositories are active. You can leave devel active on apt-get and disabled on FAM, and then use FAM to check for new non-devel updates. Also, if you have CSSU installed, be sure that it's activated in FAM as well, since by default it doesn't always activate new repositories as their added to apt-get/HAM.
![]() |
2012-03-30
, 18:15
|
Posts: 371 |
Thanked: 252 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#450
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Acidspunk For This Useful Post: | ||