Active Topics
-
Camera phone competition March 2023 "Endless" (35)
to General by Maemish - 1 day, 16 hrs ago -
TLS 1.2 for N9 is ready (28)
to MeeGo / Harmattan by smartblu9 - 1 day, 17 hrs ago -
Maemo repository (3)
to Community by torsen - 2 days, 9 hrs ago -
Error after installing Leste on sdcard (11)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Maemish - 3 days, 7 hrs ago -
Introducing ubiboot N9 (multiboot OS loader) (1,393)
to Alternatives by smatkovi - 4 days, 13 hrs ago - more...
 |
|
2010-07-01
, 08:07
|
|
Posts: 324 |
Thanked: 201 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ UK
|
#4572
|
Originally Posted by gsever
Yes, and from what ive read and from my own tests there is little if any advantage to using any of the others (at least untill we have the ability to avoid freqs and adjust the sample rate and up threshold)
Ondemand governing is default mode on the CPU, right?
Afaik there is no way to monitor the cpu freqs in real time as it is just too fast.
__________________
My N900@1Ghz Rocks
I wanted a phone, but i ended up with an all encompasing obsession
My N900@1Ghz RocksI wanted a phone, but i ended up with an all encompasing obsession
| The Following User Says Thank You to matts76 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-07-01
, 08:44
|
|
Posts: 219 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#4573
|
Originally Posted by gsever
Hey, ive just overclocked the phone.
Hey,
I am max at 850 using the ideal setting. Works flawlessly so far. The conversation dialogs loads much faster and the system responds quicker when I hit the message.
SUPER fast, SUPER happy
!they should SELL the phone with this setting!
it seems flawless!
at 600, it used to lag when i used microb and ive got an sms or im..
sound comes 1st and then the msg lol!
loving it so far!
i wish they could fix the frame rate issue though
!if ANYONE can fix the frame rate issue of the scrolling/ panoramic desktop switching (i know its not much for the panoramic desktop..but still, perfect fps shows the quality of the phone)
if anyone could fix this final problem, this phone is PERFECT!
|
|
2010-07-01
, 10:01
|
|
Banned |
Posts: 388 |
Thanked: 57 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#4574
|
I am still using the ideal mode (max @850). Over 1 Ghz seems a bit dangerous waters for me
Are there any 250-900 users around testing different voltages? What are your observations, performance wise at the limits and battery usage?
Are there any 250-900 users around testing different voltages? What are your observations, performance wise at the limits and battery usage?
 |
|
2010-07-01
, 10:11
|
|
Posts: 658 |
Thanked: 117 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#4575
|
I'm using this settings : just upped the voltages a bit cause it wasn't stable with the standard starving config
# tonism starving undervolt configuration
# minimum frequency to use
MINFREQ=250
# maximum frequency to use
MAXFREQ=900
# list of frequency configurations: each "frequency:volt,dsprate"
FREQS="0:22,90 125:22,90 250:30,180 500:33,360 550:33,400 600:36,430 700:42,430 750:44,430 805:47,430 850:48,500 900:54,500 950:52,500 1000:55,500 1100:63,520 1150:69,520"
SMARTREFLEX_VDD1=0
SMARTREFLEX_VDD2=0
GOVERNOR=ondemand
UP_THRESHOLD=75
SAMPLING_RATE=150000
IGNORE_NICE_LOAD=1
POWERSAVE_BIAS=0
# tonism starving undervolt configuration
# minimum frequency to use
MINFREQ=250
# maximum frequency to use
MAXFREQ=900
# list of frequency configurations: each "frequency:volt,dsprate"
FREQS="0:22,90 125:22,90 250:30,180 500:33,360 550:33,400 600:36,430 700:42,430 750:44,430 805:47,430 850:48,500 900:54,500 950:52,500 1000:55,500 1100:63,520 1150:69,520"
SMARTREFLEX_VDD1=0
SMARTREFLEX_VDD2=0
GOVERNOR=ondemand
UP_THRESHOLD=75
SAMPLING_RATE=150000
IGNORE_NICE_LOAD=1
POWERSAVE_BIAS=0
|
|
2010-07-01
, 12:10
|
|
Posts: 209 |
Thanked: 44 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Austria
|
#4576
|
@NokiaRocks
Hi, here are my configs. They are stable on my phone.
# minimum frequency to use
MINFREQ=500
# maximum frequency to use
MAXFREQ=1100
# list of frequency configurations: each "frequency:volt,dsprate"
FREQS="0:22,90 500:30,360 550:33,400 600:36,430 700:42,430 750:44,430 805:47,430 850:48,500 900:51,500 1000:59,500 1100:69,500 1150:72,500"
SMARTREFLEX_VDD1=0
SMARTREFLEX_VDD2=0
GOVERNOR=ondemand
UP_THRESHOLD=75
SAMPLING_RATE=150000
IGNORE_NICE_LOAD=1
POWERSAVE_BIAS=0
Last edited by Mr. Incredible; 2010-07-17 at 13:24.
Hi, here are my configs. They are stable on my phone.
# minimum frequency to use
MINFREQ=500
# maximum frequency to use
MAXFREQ=1100
# list of frequency configurations: each "frequency:volt,dsprate"
FREQS="0:22,90 500:30,360 550:33,400 600:36,430 700:42,430 750:44,430 805:47,430 850:48,500 900:51,500 1000:59,500 1100:69,500 1150:72,500"
SMARTREFLEX_VDD1=0
SMARTREFLEX_VDD2=0
GOVERNOR=ondemand
UP_THRESHOLD=75
SAMPLING_RATE=150000
IGNORE_NICE_LOAD=1
POWERSAVE_BIAS=0
Last edited by Mr. Incredible; 2010-07-17 at 13:24.
|
|
2010-07-02
, 11:54
|
|
Posts: 145 |
Thanked: 25 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#4577
|
People, how do I custom overclock the DSP?
|
|
2010-07-02
, 21:14
|
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#4578
|
i got a considerable pocket heat last day on my n900.
i was at work, it was in stock kernel (600/250mhz). for some reason, i notice a straight 1-2hours of 100% cpu usage.
then after a few moments, our I.T. told me that out work e-mail (outlook) is down, which is synced on my n900.
the n900 might be trying in hours syncing with a server that is not responding, will this may be the reason of the pocket heat? or there may also be, other reasons?
i was at work, it was in stock kernel (600/250mhz). for some reason, i notice a straight 1-2hours of 100% cpu usage.
then after a few moments, our I.T. told me that out work e-mail (outlook) is down, which is synced on my n900.
the n900 might be trying in hours syncing with a server that is not responding, will this may be the reason of the pocket heat? or there may also be, other reasons?
__________________
if i did help you, just click "Thanks" on the lower right of my post. thanks!
"The best way to break a Spell is to prevent it from being cast in the first place"
N900: 1000/1150mhz; sampling_rate 15; up_threshold 150000;
if i did help you, just click "Thanks" on the lower right of my post. thanks!
"The best way to break a Spell is to prevent it from being cast in the first place"
N900: 1000/1150mhz; sampling_rate 15; up_threshold 150000;
|
|
2010-07-02
, 21:22
|
|
Posts: 992 |
Thanked: 995 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ California
|
#4579
|
Originally Posted by MONVMENTVM
Something is definitely wrong with your measurements. Idle state should not take so much. I got 20-30 measuring it personally.
I get this conclusion from the results of the measurement!? It's 560mA vs. 736mA... ergo it's easy to understand that it's using more current at 1000MHz.
But you should give a reasonable time to settle before you start looking into BQ values. I used to wait 10secs after I locked N900 before script got values. And I got 20-30 and that doesn't depend from VDD1 (CPU voltage) but from VDD2 (peripheral devices voltage).
|
|
2010-07-03
, 10:36
|
|
Posts: 219 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#4580
|
hmm...my phone ran amazingly fast on ideal for around 8 to 9 hours..then it got back to the lazy laggy 600 mhz feel, but conky showed 850 mhz :S!
help?
help?
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:10.
I am max at 850 using the ideal setting. Works flawlessly so far. The conversation dialogs loads much faster and the system responds quicker when I hit the message.