The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nidO For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-04-13
, 10:17
|
|
Posts: 601 |
Thanked: 549 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Redditch, UK
|
#452
|
Thinking more about stress testing the device....
I'm not so sure about just opening every app available and watching thins burn...
What i think i'd like to do is get some measured tests.....
(Ie know what processes are running, and judge it on that) - do some tests and score them....
Anyone got any suggestions as to what tests, how to score etc?
The Following User Says Thank You to Switch_ For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-04-13
, 13:25
|
|
Posts: 3,203 |
Thanked: 1,391 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Worthing, England
|
#453
|
Well, based on the recent overclocking phenomenon I believe that you should be stress testing both the CPU and potentially the RAM too - not too sure about the internal architecture of the device itself but I am well into overclocking PC's. If they run on the same premise (ie; unless you de-link the FSB to the CPU then the RAM clocks up as you increase the FSB on the chip) then both would require stress testing, to ensure that they are able to cope with it. I have also seen that the Desktop Command Execution Widget can monitor the temperature of the CPU, meaning you can initiate a stress test and then run the same kind of code to ensure that the CPU is not frying or reaching its Tmax.
If its possible it would require a port of something akin to Prime95 (using Lucas-Lehmer iterations to find higher and higher prime numbers) or SuperPi (calculating pi down to as many decimal places as possible)
Just a suggestion....
Also read elsewhere you might want to give it a facelift - if you want a hand with graphics for that one I'd be happy to lend a hand
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to noobmonkey For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-04-13
, 13:26
|
|
Posts: 3,203 |
Thanked: 1,391 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Worthing, England
|
#454
|
nbench has been compiled for N900's, maybe you could simply include and execute that (see http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p=604794&postcount=3)
Alternatively, how about getting Mprime running, im sure there must be an arm-compiled copy kicking around somewhere.
|
2010-04-13
, 13:33
|
|
Posts: 3,203 |
Thanked: 1,391 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Worthing, England
|
#455
|
|
2010-04-13
, 13:43
|
Posts: 278 |
Thanked: 303 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Norwich, UK
|
#456
|
With regards to basic benchmarking to begin with..... something like this could work? - it has a completion average time - so can be used as a basic score....
It allows the user to define their own starting point (IE i can count processes active and divide the total score by that to get a final score!) - it actually a python test - but relyss on the device to power it through
|
2010-04-13
, 14:11
|
|
Posts: 601 |
Thanked: 549 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Redditch, UK
|
#457
|
In a previous version there was a cpu temperature monitor - but it is very hit and miss - so i took it out
Definitley any help with the fx would be appreciated - i'll have to elarn how to swap buttons for images etc....
I'm thinking of removing the tab and having a main window... Could have a healthceck symbol (like the logo) in big - each end of the cross is a different button? - each loads up their own full screen sub-windows maybe?
also kinda like the idea of the main screen being semi-transparent - apart from the healthcheck cross? - not sure if that makes sense!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Switch_ For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-04-13
, 15:30
|
|
Posts: 3,203 |
Thanked: 1,391 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Worthing, England
|
#458
|
I believe that the desktop command execution widget uses a simple d-bus command to run out the temperature output directly from the sensor on the proc itself - however, in your healthchek this would probably require a periodic update, say 500ms, especially if you are cheking the OC effect on the CPU. I'll find the post and find the command for you.
Be my pleasure - AFAIK, the buttons are simply *.png files stashed into the repo for the app itself - aren't they? All it requires is a re-hash of the PNG using the same pixel constraints and voila, button now becomes pretty and shiny. Although this in itself may well be governed by the THEME rather than the APP.... Hmmm.....
Sounds good much better GUI, and then to have the main HC cross in there too, with each section relating to an extremity of the cross. Can be done, may require image mapping in html to make it work though....
Makes perfect sense to me, but I was discussing this very point with someone else earlier - the "semi-transparent" effect that is applied when you move into the menu's from the main hildon desktop is actually a pixel blur effect. The problem is this (I believe, but will stand to be corrected), the coding for the menu is core to the OS whereas the coding for the apps is not interdependent on the same libraries that the OS is. Tying in the app to this parameter might be quite difficult, but I'm not a coder so haven't got a leg to stand on really. Transparency is not possible I don't believe, unless you are talking about widgets, which, to be fair, your app could easily be - as a shortcut to the main app itself....?
Dunno - I'll get cracking on some images for you to play about with. Post up here when I got some done
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to noobmonkey For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-04-13
, 19:55
|
Posts: 146 |
Thanked: 76 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Poland
|
#459
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Robb For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-04-13
, 20:11
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#460
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mikec For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
check, faulty, front camera, gps, hardware, healthcheck, test |
|
Alternatively, how about getting Mprime running, im sure there must be an arm-compiled copy kicking around somewhere.