![]() |
2017-01-11
, 08:23
|
|
Posts: 943 |
Thanked: 3,228 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Zagreb
|
#471
|
![]() |
2017-01-11
, 08:49
|
|
Posts: 6,450 |
Thanked: 20,983 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#472
|
The Following User Says Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2017-01-25
, 23:47
|
Posts: 1,873 |
Thanked: 4,529 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ North Potomac MD
|
#473
|
![]() |
2017-01-26
, 04:12
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#474
|
Sound familiar...
https://www.xda-developers.com/free-...rity-for-2017/
![]() |
2017-01-26
, 05:48
|
Posts: 671 |
Thanked: 1,630 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#475
|
I of course think FSF is betting on the wrong horse now but whatever, did they listen to me before, huh?
The Following User Says Thank You to theonelaw For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2017-01-26
, 19:59
|
|
Posts: 634 |
Thanked: 3,266 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Colombia
|
#476
|
I of course think FSF is betting on the wrong horse now but whatever, did they listen to me before, huh?
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to wicket For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-01-26
, 22:07
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#477
|
In defence of Replicant, unlike Maemo and Sailfish, it is entirely free. Although I do find it a bit ironic that the FSF won't endorse the Neo900 because the baseband requires closed firmware, yet they promote Replicant which must be used on devices that have the exact same problem.
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2017-01-27
, 13:24
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#478
|
In defence of Replicant, unlike Maemo and Sailfish, it is entirely free. Although I do find it a bit ironic that the FSF won't endorse the Neo900 because the baseband requires closed firmware, yet they promote Replicant which must be used on devices that have the exact same problem.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to juiceme For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2017-01-28
, 03:25
|
|
Posts: 634 |
Thanked: 3,266 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Colombia
|
#479
|
If the existing baseband chipset is closed, then I can see why they'd recommend otherwise especially since open source baseband chipsets and whatnot do exist (right?).
Will adopt a wait and see stance on this.
I cannnot see how it is entirely free if you cannot run it without blobs and closed drivers.
If you can do that, then I am really intrested!
The Following User Says Thank You to wicket For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2017-01-28
, 14:08
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#480
|
I was bit hasty with my previous post, it wasn't entirely correct (now edited). The problem the FSF have with the Neo900 is that the baseband firmware is upgradable/flashable, otherwise they would treat the baseband as a dumb appliance and would not care if the firmware was closed (flawed logic in my opinion but that's another debate)
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to juiceme For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
'smarvelous, 'swonderful, latest, not greatest |
|