|
2011-08-09
, 17:23
|
Posts: 3,401 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ London, UK
|
#472
|
Going from a turnover of 6.5 billion euros in 1996 to a 2010 revenue of 42.45 billion euros, the company should be more worth now than the stock prices indicate. Either that, or the stock analysts would have to have known/believed at that time that Nokia would continue to grow like crazy and to keep selling well for years without losing market share. I don't think they were all that confident about that then. They just follow hypes.
Let's compare some (Wiki) numbers.
Apple has a 2010 revenue worth 46 billion Euro.
Exxon Mobile has a 2010 revenue worth 270 billion Euro.
Yet Apple is battling Exxon as the #1 most valuable company on the stock exchanges?
|
2011-08-09
, 20:38
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#473
|
|
2011-08-10
, 15:41
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#474
|
|
2011-08-10
, 21:31
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#475
|
|
2011-08-11
, 00:58
|
Posts: 519 |
Thanked: 366 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ North Carolina (Formerly Denmark and Iceland)
|
#476
|
This thread I could believe as well:
jwf
Well it makes sense you said Nokia are looking to sell their smartphone devision to them
9 hours ago
Eldar Murtazin
ms dont want to buy it now
9 hours ago
jwf
So they have changed their mind or are they waiting for suitable time ?
9 hours ago
Eldar Murtazin
have no details. According to sources Elop couldnt show progress
9 hours ago via Twitter for Android
Bhairav
So what happens now elop gets fired nokia goes android gets swipe on android?
7 hours ago
|
2011-08-11
, 01:18
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#477
|
|
2011-08-11
, 01:24
|
Posts: 519 |
Thanked: 366 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ North Carolina (Formerly Denmark and Iceland)
|
#478
|
Well, he didn't gain any cred from the MS buyout story, if he miss on the [far fetched sounding] S40 cancellation claim too, he will not have any left.
If it turns out to be true, he'll have regained a lot. Lot of Nokia cred riding on that statement :B
|
2011-08-11
, 17:36
|
Posts: 457 |
Thanked: 600 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#479
|
|
2011-08-11
, 19:44
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 552 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
|
#480
|
Tags |
goodbye nokia, investing, last quotes, lumiatard, samsung, specc=ericsson, stock, the elop flop, the flop elop, tizen |
|
4.85 (touched yesterday) last seen in Jan -98 levels (before the 2:1 split).
We need 4.33 to be at Dec -97 levels.
If we pass 4.125, we'll be at May -97 levels.
Under 3.97 (-ish), we're reach April -97 levels.
To go back even further, we'll need to pass 3.555 - Dec. -96 levels.
The lowest 1996 number were 1.992, to find anything lower than that we'll have to go to Oct 1994. 1.992 isn't likely to happen anyway as far as I understand it.
This is like a competition.
How low can Elop go?
Going from a turnover of 6.5 billion euros in 1996 to a 2010 revenue of 42.45 billion euros, the company should be more worth now than the stock prices indicate. Either that, or the stock analysts would have to have known/believed at that time that Nokia would continue to grow like crazy and to keep selling well for years without losing market share. I don't think they were all that confident about that then. They just follow hypes.
Let's compare some (Wiki) numbers.
Apple has a 2010 revenue worth 46 billion Euro.
Exxon Mobile has a 2010 revenue worth 270 billion Euro.
Yet Apple is battling Exxon as the #1 most valuable company on the stock exchanges?
Analysts are PR-damaged, brainwashed and crazy. Apple is the #1 bubble.
Qwerty is hot? Stylus or not? Let the buyer decide! The Nokia ¹ Smartphone - Build your ¹