Wazapp Public Beta for N9 [0.9.20] - Page 485 - maemo.org

Active Topics

Firefox with Leste (10)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 2 days, 22 hrs ago
more...

Page 485 of 1103

485

Thread Tools

	Morpog	2012-09-18 , 15:54
	Posts: 956 \| Thanked: 2,628 times \| Joined on Nov 2011	#4841

user brkn always beats me at translating on transifex

@cepi
string freeze?

Quote & Reply |

	chenliangchen	2012-09-18 , 15:55
	Posts: 1,478 \| Thanked: 9,871 times \| Joined on Dec 2008 @ Shanghai / London	#4842

Originally Posted by gpollano

Hi!
I'm using Cepi's last version (1835) and since last night I could not send any message.

I get contacts "last seen at xxx" but all my messages are red-dotted.
I can't receive either.

Any help?
I already try:
* Deleting *.db
* Uninstalling/Installing
* Rebooting

Thanks

Same here... Maybe wait for a new version.

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to chenliangchen For This Useful Post:
gpollano

	Dazsa	2012-09-18 , 15:55
	Posts: 198 \| Thanked: 150 times \| Joined on May 2012	#4843

Originally Posted by Hariainm

What about making that bubble chat green when there's unread messages? Also, the 5 notification number is a bit misplaced, to much to the right in my opinion

Cepi, can you told us about the incompatibilities with different databases from different builds? Are old databases corrupting newer builds, forcing the app to close abruptly and "inventing" contacts, like mine does?

Can you point us a tool to import old chats to the new database structure? I'm playing with a sqlite browser to erase "ghost" contacts, but wazapp keeps crashing upon start.

an opinion: green bubble would not show you how many unread messages you have. The notification number in the middle would visually look "heavy" centered and on the left would not be nice overlapping avatars. On the right side is fine as it makes the square seem more balanced with info

Quote & Reply |

brkn	2012-09-18 , 16:01
Posts: 299 \| Thanked: 557 times \| Joined on Aug 2012	#4844

Originally Posted by Morpog

user brkn always beats me at translating on transifex

@cepi
string freeze?

10 chars...

Quote & Reply |

	CepiPerez	2012-09-18 , 16:11
	Posts: 1,023 \| Thanked: 4,421 times \| Joined on Feb 2010 @ Argentina	#4845

Can someone test registration with this version?
I'm getting too-recent:164 cause I've tried a lot with old code
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/12134784/MEE...-2012-1305.deb

Guys, if you don't like the new look, make some photoshop images and we'll discuss it here

__________________
Filebox / FileCase for Maemo / Harmattan / Sailfish
FlowPlayer for Maemo / Harmattan / Sailfish
Whatsup for Harmattan / Sailfish
CallBlocker for Harmattan

Support my work:
Paypal / Bitcoin

Quote & Reply |

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to CepiPerez For This Useful Post:
Alee, ibrakalifa, kerksuli, lebanez, N9owner, smoothc

	Morpog	2012-09-18 , 16:16
	Posts: 956 \| Thanked: 2,628 times \| Joined on Nov 2011	#4846

Cepi in the translation brkn and me are unsure on several translations if you are refering to singular or plural.

Example:
%1 have changed the subject to %2

shouldn't it be "has changed the subject" or is this based on a groups action and therefore plural?

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to Morpog For This Useful Post:
brkn

	CepiPerez	2012-09-18 , 16:20
	Posts: 1,023 \| Thanked: 4,421 times \| Joined on Feb 2010 @ Argentina	#4847

@Morpog: it was discussed here
Example:
"You have change the subject"
"Lars Ulrich has changed the subject"

Quote & Reply |

	Morpog	2012-09-18 , 16:24
	Posts: 956 \| Thanked: 2,628 times \| Joined on Nov 2011	#4848

Originally Posted by CepiPerez

@Morpog: it was discussed here
Example:
"You have change the subject"
"Lars Ulrich has changed the subject"

Must have missed it back then. Thanks for clarifying. It's hard to decide based on "%1 is....... "

Quote & Reply |

	The Best Isaac	2012-09-18 , 16:28
	Posts: 97 \| Thanked: 157 times \| Joined on Jan 2012 @ Germany	#4849

Originally Posted by Morpog

Must have missed it back then. Thanks for clarifying. It's hard to decide based on "%1 is....... "

But the content of "%1" decides whether you use second (*You* have changed ...) or third person (**User XYZ* has changed ...).
And there is no source string for the second option.
So, no matter how you translate (though this problem already exists in the original English language) this the output could be both wrong or right, depending on who changed the subject. Sorry, there is. Overlooked this.

Last edited by The Best Isaac; 2012-09-18 at 16:55.

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to The Best Isaac For This Useful Post:
brkn

juancpulidom	2012-09-18 , 16:28
Posts: 13 \| Thanked: 6 times \| Joined on Aug 2012 @ Venezuela	#4850