|
2013-02-03
, 08:11
|
|
Posts: 644 |
Thanked: 480 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
@ Finland
|
#483
|
|
2013-02-03
, 09:39
|
|
Posts: 218 |
Thanked: 151 times |
Joined on Dec 2011
@ Slovakia
|
#484
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Rusnak-COBRA For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-02-03
, 09:56
|
|
Posts: 644 |
Thanked: 480 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
@ Finland
|
#485
|
|
2013-02-03
, 10:04
|
|
Posts: 218 |
Thanked: 151 times |
Joined on Dec 2011
@ Slovakia
|
#486
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Rusnak-COBRA For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-02-03
, 10:55
|
|
Posts: 644 |
Thanked: 480 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
@ Finland
|
#487
|
|
2013-02-04
, 11:34
|
Posts: 164 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Jun 2012
|
#488
|
|
2013-02-04
, 16:12
|
|
Posts: 2,222 |
Thanked: 12,651 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ SOL 3
|
#489
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to joerg_rw For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-02-05
, 01:52
|
Posts: 164 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Jun 2012
|
#490
|
An9: no, a 10s "flash" is clearly a failed flash. Probably you didn't notice that it failed, I can't tell about winXP since I don't ever use that OS, but odds are it might not even print an error message. Whatever, I doubt this has to do with the speed of the PC, more likely flashing failed on the "fast" PC due to other reasons like missing/wrong drivers, problems with USB hw, whatever.
cheers
/j
Use the CODE tags to wrap your logs.
You have a sim-locked device? That could be the cause for the failure too...