felbutss
|
2010-02-10
, 23:58
|
|
Posts: 579 |
Thanked: 286 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Australia
|
#41
|
|
2010-02-11
, 00:17
|
Posts: 1,179 |
Thanked: 770 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#42
|
The issue with the album art has been addressed in at least 2 separate threads, the problem is how the songs have been tagged and solutions have been offered. Anything to do with iPhone is never going to be standard, iTunes is by definition a disaster.
And there us every excuse for a 500 pound device not being as good as playing music as a 40 pound mp3 player. ONE OF THEM IS AN MP3 PLAYER. That's all it does. It doesn't do anything else, the entirety of its existence is to play music. The N900's on the other hand is NOT solely to play music. As I said, when your 40 pound mp3 player can do ANYTHING else the N900 does I will be happy to listen to you compare the two devices.
I will now go back to trying to get my 3 year old mp3 player to play openarena. Its not working so well
|
2010-02-11
, 00:19
|
Posts: 362 |
Thanked: 113 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#43
|
The Following User Says Thank You to UNderworld For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-11
, 00:20
|
Posts: 296 |
Thanked: 126 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ New York City
|
#44
|
How is it a miserable excuse? By your logic if they hadn't included a media player at all then this wouldn't even be an issue.
i am still baffled, how is the media player performance not acceptable? have u done any benchmark tests or u r just saying that.
The Following User Says Thank You to sadfist For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-11
, 00:29
|
Posts: 296 |
Thanked: 126 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ New York City
|
#45
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sadfist For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-11
, 00:39
|
Posts: 604 |
Thanked: 108 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Phoenix, WA
|
#46
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SAABoy For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-11
, 00:39
|
Posts: 25 |
Thanked: 93 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ USA
|
#47
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to tschak909 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-11
, 00:56
|
Posts: 80 |
Thanked: 50 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Philadelphia, PA
|
#48
|
I'm sure this will be completely ignored, but...here goes anyway....
The Media player is built atop many pieces of software, that fluidly integrate together.
The most critical of these is the PulseAudio daemon. If you CLAIM to want to understand this device, go to their project site, and read up on it.
There has been considerable progress in PulseAudio's design since its inception a few short years ago, but the majority of PulseAudio's development has been on x86 and desktop targets, which is very different from the ARM stuff being targeted here.
It will get better, but as with all things open source, it takes time and dedicated programmer time. This is not Nokia's fault, and you should NOT be pointing the finger at them.
I am very dismayed and DISGUSTED at the sheer arrogance and air of self-entitlement of the most vocal detractors on this forum, yes...you paid for this device...the same as you paid for your desktop....
but unlike most "phones" ... this device is built atop a highly extensible stack, of which the vast majority of it is NOT developed by Nokia, and is developed in an open forum. Nokia is doing something radically different here, and it WILL pay off, as developers from the surrounding projects such as PulseAudio, gstreamer (the modular processing framework that connects this all together), etc mature.
so please guys,
JUST CHILL, you have three options:
(1) file bug reports with Nokia or the surrounding projects.
(2) join a project and contribute code
(3) STFU and WAIT PATIENTLY.
-Thom
The Following User Says Thank You to IWantToMarryTheN900 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-11
, 01:07
|
Posts: 1,179 |
Thanked: 770 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#49
|
I'm sure this will be completely ignored, but...here goes anyway....
The Media player is built atop many pieces of software, that fluidly integrate together.
The most critical of these is the PulseAudio daemon. If you CLAIM to want to understand this device, go to their project site, and read up on it.
There has been considerable progress in PulseAudio's design since its inception a few short years ago, but the majority of PulseAudio's development has been on x86 and desktop targets, which is very different from the ARM stuff being targeted here.
It will get better, but as with all things open source, it takes time and dedicated programmer time. This is not Nokia's fault, and you should NOT be pointing the finger at them.
I am very dismayed and DISGUSTED at the sheer arrogance and air of self-entitlement of the most vocal detractors on this forum, yes...you paid for this device...the same as you paid for your desktop....
but unlike most "phones" ... this device is built atop a highly extensible stack, of which the vast majority of it is NOT developed by Nokia, and is developed in an open forum. Nokia is doing something radically different here, and it WILL pay off, as developers from the surrounding projects such as PulseAudio, gstreamer (the modular processing framework that connects this all together), etc mature.
so please guys,
JUST CHILL, you have three options:
(1) file bug reports with Nokia or the surrounding projects.
(2) join a project and contribute code
(3) STFU and WAIT PATIENTLY.
-Thom
|
2010-02-11
, 01:17
|
Posts: 455 |
Thanked: 278 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Oregon, USA
|
#50
|
I'm sure this will be completely ignored, but...here goes anyway....
The Media player is built atop many pieces of software, that fluidly integrate together.
The most critical of these is the PulseAudio daemon. If you CLAIM to want to understand this device, go to their project site, and read up on it.
There has been considerable progress in PulseAudio's design since its inception a few short years ago, but the majority of PulseAudio's development has been on x86 and desktop targets, which is very different from the ARM stuff being targeted here.
It will get better, but as with all things open source, it takes time and dedicated programmer time. This is not Nokia's fault, and you should NOT be pointing the finger at them.
I am very dismayed and DISGUSTED at the sheer arrogance and air of self-entitlement of the most vocal detractors on this forum, yes...you paid for this device...the same as you paid for your desktop....
but unlike most "phones" ... this device is built atop a highly extensible stack, of which the vast majority of it is NOT developed by Nokia, and is developed in an open forum. Nokia is doing something radically different here, and it WILL pay off, as developers from the surrounding projects such as PulseAudio, gstreamer (the modular processing framework that connects this all together), etc mature.
so please guys,
JUST CHILL, you have three options:
(1) file bug reports with Nokia or the surrounding projects.
(2) join a project and contribute code
(3) STFU and WAIT PATIENTLY.
-Thom
Tags |
waiting impatiently |
|