Active Topics
|
2010-05-27
, 10:43
|
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#42
|
it says meego is now available for n900 to download. will i need to get another n900 if i wish to keep maemo 5 software?
or does it need to be double boot?
or does it need to be double boot?
__________________
if i did help you, just click "Thanks" on the lower right of my post. thanks!
"The best way to break a Spell is to prevent it from being cast in the first place"
N900: 1000/1150mhz; sampling_rate 15; up_threshold 150000;
if i did help you, just click "Thanks" on the lower right of my post. thanks!
"The best way to break a Spell is to prevent it from being cast in the first place"
N900: 1000/1150mhz; sampling_rate 15; up_threshold 150000;
|
|
2010-05-27
, 11:49
|
|
Posts: 29 |
Thanked: 360 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Pirkkala, Finland
|
#43
|
About MeeGo 1.0 Core release for N900
It does NOT include
- Mobile UI/UX (N900 will boot to Xterm)
- Reference Applications
It is intended for MeeGo developers for development purposes, and
- has practically NO value for end users
- has little value for MeeGo application developers.
Please do NOT install it if you don't know what you need it for.
For mor in formation, pls. see
http://wiki.meego.com/ARM/N900
Br,
//Harri
It does NOT include
- Mobile UI/UX (N900 will boot to Xterm)
- Reference Applications
It is intended for MeeGo developers for development purposes, and
- has practically NO value for end users
- has little value for MeeGo application developers.
Please do NOT install it if you don't know what you need it for.
For mor in formation, pls. see
http://wiki.meego.com/ARM/N900
Br,
//Harri
|
|
2010-05-29
, 11:17
|
|
Posts: 152 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Shanghai, China
|
#44
|
Gooooooooooooooood News !
Finally, I can use MeeGo on N900.
Hope you can support to MeeGo 1.1 or 1.2.
Maemo is great, hope MeeGo can do better !
Finally, I can use MeeGo on N900.
Hope you can support to MeeGo 1.1 or 1.2.
Maemo is great, hope MeeGo can do better !
|
|
2010-05-29
, 23:21
|
|
Posts: 124 |
Thanked: 52 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Sweden
|
#45
|
[Answered Question about Hardware Adaption]
Will you implement multitouch emulation by combining proximity sensor and screen gestures?
ANSWER: http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=50763&page=7
(This seems like the appropriate place for this post, for anyone who missed that question... it would be nice if others could add similarly answered questions about hardware adaption, from other threads)
Will you implement multitouch emulation by combining proximity sensor and screen gestures?
ANSWER: http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=50763&page=7
(This seems like the appropriate place for this post, for anyone who missed that question... it would be nice if others could add similarly answered questions about hardware adaption, from other threads)
|
|
2010-06-01
, 00:02
|
|
Posts: 1,042 |
Thanked: 430 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#46
|
What would happen to meego if nokia would start releasing intel driven mobile devices? Would the applications of meego x86 be backwards compatible to those with meego ARM chips?
|
|
2010-06-01
, 01:03
|
|
Posts: 60 |
Thanked: 144 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Philadelphia
|
#47
|
Radicalz38: There is no "backwards" involved, all meego programs will run on all ARM and x86 platforms. That's the whole point of making the MeeGo platform in the first place.
 |
|
2010-06-01
, 01:47
|
|
Posts: 579 |
Thanked: 286 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Australia
|
#48
|
ccyyaaaaa. No meego from nokia that is shocking lol.
hello Meego Hackers addition from community. Will help and contribute all I can to its development.
hello Meego Hackers addition from community. Will help and contribute all I can to its development.
|
|
2010-06-01
, 01:49
|
|
Posts: 1,042 |
Thanked: 430 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#49
|
Originally Posted by flailingmonkey
0.o but the processor instructions are different? Well if that's the case then it's pretty neat! So I guess intel's implementation would only make a difference performance wise I guess?
Radicalz38: There is no "backwards" involved, all meego programs will run on all ARM and x86 platforms. That's the whole point of making the MeeGo platform in the first place.
|
|
2010-06-01
, 03:05
|
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#50
|
Originally Posted by Radicalz38
The instruction sets are different, yes. This is resolved via the build server which will compile both architectures and ease the process of cross compiling for the developer.
0.o but the processor instructions are different? Well if that's the case then it's pretty neat! So I guess intel's implementation would only make a difference performance wise I guess?
Since the APIs are the same, there shouldn't be anything (barring hardware specific stuff) that prevents a developer from targeting all MeeGo devices regardless of the CPU. It effectively becomes just another checkbox.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post: | ||
"But when you’re living on the bleeding edge, you should not be surprised when you do, in fact, bleed."