mattmull
|
2009-11-25
, 14:21
|
Posts: 29 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#41
|
|
2009-11-25
, 14:27
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#42
|
Make sense, if the processor is getting stuck in some kind of loop, it won't be able to pet the watchdog. Can you run top in the background dumping to a file or something equivalent to try and capture what process is hijacking the cpu before it reboots?
|
2009-11-25
, 14:30
|
Posts: 20 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Ancona, Italy
|
#43
|
The Following User Says Thank You to javajix For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-11-25
, 14:33
|
|
Posts: 1,076 |
Thanked: 176 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#44
|
|
2009-11-25
, 14:38
|
Posts: 40 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#45
|
|
2009-11-25
, 14:39
|
Posts: 42 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#46
|
|
2009-11-25
, 14:43
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#47
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mikec For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-11-25
, 14:45
|
Posts: 114 |
Thanked: 113 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#48
|
|
2009-11-25
, 14:47
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#49
|
I think vmstat will be more usable.
Open a shell and type:
vmstat -m 10 > <path_where_to_place_text_file>/<file_name>.txt
leave the shell opened, this will write process statistics every 10 seconds.
I'll do the same.
|
2009-11-25
, 14:58
|
Posts: 40 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#50
|
Tags |
lack of quality control |
|