Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 14 hrs, 47 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 6 days, 3 hrs ago - more...
 |
tso |
2008-03-12
, 21:21
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#41
|
TI has just started to roll out cortexA8 based chips iirc, and in a years time we are probably looking at A9. and im not sure if its intel thats the biggest issue when it comes to low watt x86. via launched what appeared to be a impressive design recently....
|
|
2008-03-12
, 21:56
|
|
Posts: 334 |
Thanked: 55 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ Eastern Ontario, Canada
|
#42
|
Originally Posted by tso
How does Intel Atom stack up?
not sure if its intel thats the biggest issue when it comes to low watt x86.
"The chips have a thermal design power (TDP) specification in 0.6-2.5 watt range and scale to 1.8GHz speeds depending on customer need."
http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archi...d=tech_atom+pr
I read that the Asus eee 900 will use a 1 ghz. version to be released in May this year.
Last edited by dont; 2008-03-12 at 21:59.
 |
|
2008-03-12
, 22:08
|
|
Posts: 1,137 |
Thanked: 402 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Catalunya
|
#43
|
Originally Posted by Texrat
No, I just doubt the n800 will be supported anymore.
You're doubtful that the ITs have a future?
|
|
2008-03-12
, 22:17
|
|
Posts: 1,137 |
Thanked: 402 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Catalunya
|
#44
|
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles
If you refer to this post in december (and that's just one, BTW), I don't remeber you replying.
What is this, the fourth time now that I've told you that that feature had always been planned for Diablo?
 |
|
2008-03-13
, 21:41
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#45
|
Originally Posted by luca
But-- my post wasn't specific to N800.
No, I just doubt the n800 will be supported anymore.
And keep in mind that N800 is compatible enough with the N810 that support for the latter means de facto support for the former.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 |
|
2008-03-13
, 21:51
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#46
|
Originally Posted by Texrat
So are you ruling out the possibility of an N810-only upgrade (perhaps due to licensing rather than technical issues) at some point? Or does that de facto merely represent acknowledgement of the obvious glee with which N800 users would pirate any such upgrade?
But-- my post wasn't specific to N800.
And keep in mind that N800 is compatible enough with the N810 that support for the latter means de facto support for the former.
P) Arrrrrgh, Mateys!
|
|
2008-03-13
, 21:52
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#47
|
Nope. Nope.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
|
|
2008-03-13
, 22:13
|
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#48
|
Originally Posted by dont
A quick Google search shows that a 500MHz ARM11 consumes about 0.1W on the average. "TDP" specification refers to the maximum amount of power dissipated by the device. In other words, your Atom CPU will consume no less than 0.6..2.5W (depending on the computational load).
How does Intel Atom stack up? "The chips have a thermal design power (TDP) specification in 0.6-2.5 watt range and scale to 1.8GHz speeds depending on customer need."
Also notice that OMAP2 chips are produced using 90nm technology while Atom will probably start at 65nm and then go to 45nm. If TI goes up the technology ladder, its OMAP CPUs will consume even less power.
So, how does Atom stack up? It does not.
 |
|
2008-03-14
, 01:48
|
|
Posts: 868 |
Thanked: 474 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Capital District, NY, USA
|
#50
|
Originally Posted by fms
Oh, they stack up... haven't you seen the pictures? Those MID's are huge and thick, great for stacking.
So, how does Atom stack up? It does not.