Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#41
Originally Posted by iamthewalrus View Post
But a lot of issues that are mentioned on ITT are a result of Nokia's design decisions rather than bugs in the strict sense.
It appears as though maemo bugzilla is still appropriate. That's what "Severity: enhancement" is for. Heck, bug 277 requested a redesign of the 770's cover. The Nokia staff that monitor bugzilla went so far as to create a new "hardware" category for this bug, and according to the notes, forwarded it along to the appropriate person.

So, yes, they may dispute some bugs as requests that directly contradict their design standards, but they'll never know those designs aren't matching what people want if no one ever asks.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#42
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
To an extent I agree, but I still have to believe that the proper amount of protest can instigate change...
Perhaps, but I suspect it'll need an awful lot of protest. Take reordering browser bookmarks, for instance. A standard feature in most browsers since bookmarks were introduced, but why can't we do that? Because of the UI spec. The amount of energy that I'm gonna bet will be required to get the UI spec changed (or some sort of exemption made ) isn't really commensurate with the reasonability of a bug like this. It's way too much work for such a braindead bug.
 
Posts: 356 | Thanked: 231 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#43
Fonts...
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
Such are the pitfalls of an immature Linux platform. An enhancement request for a GUI font-manager of some sort, maybe?
No, with KDE you can easily add fonts. Thats problem you mentioned earlier. Nokia decided to use Linux but tried to hide that fact, tried so hard that it hidden some existing solutions from themselves
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#44
Originally Posted by vvaz View Post
No, with KDE you can easily add fonts. Thats problem you mentioned earlier.
Did you read what I wrote? Let me quote it here for you with the important part emphasized:

Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
Such are the pitfalls of an immature Linux platform.
KDE is hardly what one would describe as "immature". It has been around a lot longer (almost 10 years longer, in fact) than maemo/ITOS, and has had plenty of time to develop a good GUI font manager.

ITOS is still young (and, primarily, a mobile platform—how many cellphones or PDAs do you see with good GUI font management), a good GUI font manager will arrive with time. For now, sticking fonts in /home/user/.fonts/ and running fc-cache isn't particularly difficult.

Originally Posted by vvaz View Post
Nokia decided to use Linux but tried to hide that fact, tried so hard that it hidden some existing solutions from themselves
This is a meaningless statement.
 
Posts: 356 | Thanked: 231 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#45
Originally Posted by Benson View Post
It quickly becomes obvious that microb is missing any sensible configuration method; you can either go to about:config, or you can settle for the three-checkboxes preferences dialog. And that's a sad failing, even though I'd be using such config for lots of other stuff, not for fonts.
Well, that is the problem also for desktop version of Firefox/Mozilla and I hate it also there. I think primary reasons to change Internet engine were a) better compatibility with Internet applications like Google suite b) cut financial corners (free Mozilla vs. Opera)? Everyday usability stuff was far, far behind.
 
Posts: 356 | Thanked: 231 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#46
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
Did you read what I wrote? Let me quote it here for you with the important part emphasized:
Sorry, misunderstood you: "immature Linux" vs "immature platform as Maemo".
 
Posts: 751 | Thanked: 522 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ East Gowanus
#47
Do agree with most of the things posted in the OP except for the video calling. Setup 2 googletalk accounts input those credentials into your two tablets. Get network access on both tablets goto >Contacts find your contact and select >internet call... the other tablet will ring, the N810 will automatically launch video, the N800 has to have the little camera pulled out. I use video chat over google with my girlfriend 3G tethering >wifi, works well and works flawlessly. Look into your network setting or something because it does work better than gizmo and is a native application.
 
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#48
Originally Posted by vvaz View Post
Well, that is the problem also for desktop version of Firefox/Mozilla and I hate it also there. I think primary reasons to change Internet engine were a) better compatibility with Internet applications like Google suite b) cut financial corners (free Mozilla vs. Opera)? Everyday usability stuff was far, far behind.
Been running Opera for some time, but I remembered FF as having much more config options than microb. <shrug />
 
RogerS's Avatar
Posts: 772 | Thanked: 183 times | Joined on Jul 2005 @ Montclair, NJ (NYC suburbs)
#49
Originally Posted by mobiledivide View Post
Do agree with most of the things posted in the OP except for the video calling. Setup 2 googletalk accounts input those credentials into your two tablets. Get network access on both tablets goto >Contacts find your contact and select >internet call... the other tablet will ring, the N810 will automatically launch video, the N800 has to have the little camera pulled out. I use video chat over google with my girlfriend 3G tethering >wifi, works well and works flawlessly. Look into your network setting or something because it does work better than gizmo and is a native application.
OK, you describe exactly what happened to us, except the automatic launching of video. We expected it. We tried different things in case we weren't triggering something that was being looked for. Nothing got us video.

It's a simple enough process, you can understand how thoroughly we experimented, having taken over an hour to try and re-try things.

Anyway, this particular grievance, I will mark up to "individual unit" problems or "the specific network we were trying on" or something else particular, and not general to all IT's.
__________________
N900 Guide Brief intro to the Nokia N900 (http://n900guide.com/)
Maemoan since July 2005 )
 
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#50
Did the voice call do fine, but just the video failed? Or no connection working at all?
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:44.