![]() |
2008-10-08
, 18:17
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#42
|
Same thing: avoid the long column + short column layout. It wastes space. Instead, break your page into 2-3 equal-sized columns and make them resize fluidly. Also, I would avoid shadows, fancy corners, and other similar stuff: a lot of people are likely to load this page on their tablets connected via GPRS, EDGE, or 3G. A lot of them pay per-MB rates. The above visual elements are pretty useless and just add to the traffic.
Now, as far as content is concerned: I see that you have following content at the page:
1. Two featured applications ("pearls")
2. Menu of important links
3. About Maemo blurb
4. Announcements at the bottom
5. Bad photo of some guy with a number
6. Some inline ads
Of these 6, only #2 and #4 are of any use to a regular maemo.org visitor. The rest is as good as decorations. Furthermore, #4 is at the very bottom and #2 links are named in such a way that only a geek will understand what they mean (Bugzilla, Wiki, Garage).
![]() |
2008-10-08
, 18:17
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#43
|
fms, it'd be great if you could join the maemo-community mailing list and post your comments there. More people are participating in this discussion there -- and have been for a while -- which is how these designs are being created.
As for your comments on the "pretty" aspects of the design(s), well... That's your opinion. As a Web 2.0 designer by trade, these are just how we do it these days.
The Following User Says Thank You to fms For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2008-10-08
, 18:26
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#44
|
You can refer to IRC meeting logs if you are interested (mgedmin must have them on his site).
![]() |
2008-10-08
, 18:34
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#45
|
(But really, what else are you going to call a wiki?
![]() |
2008-10-08
, 18:49
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#46
|
Documentation. Manual. Handbook. Help Guide. I think a few more have been suggested during the IRC meeting.
![]() |
2008-10-08
, 19:12
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#47
|
None of which accurately describe it, though. (Documentation comes closest, IMHO.)
While wiki is an incomplete description, it's certainly at least as accurate as any of those, and to anyone familiar with open-source projects and how they run, it will carry additional, largely correct, implications about the content.
I don't see much gain to relabeling any of those, and particularly wiki seems to be a loss by renaming. Maybe I just hate users.
![]() |
2008-10-08
, 19:17
|
|
Posts: 4,708 |
Thanked: 4,649 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Bulgaria
|
#48
|
![]() |
2008-10-08
, 19:56
|
|
Posts: 1,605 |
Thanked: 1,601 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Southern California
|
#49
|
The Following User Says Thank You to timsamoff For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2008-10-09
, 04:15
|
|
Posts: 1,605 |
Thanked: 1,601 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Southern California
|
#50
|
The Following User Says Thank You to timsamoff For This Useful Post: | ||
As for your comments on the "pretty" aspects of the design(s), well... That's your opinion. As a Web 2.0 designer by trade, these are just how we do it these days. (Have a look here.) Most (if not all) of these sites work great on my tablet.
Thanks,
Tim
http://samoff.com