|
2009-01-09
, 07:16
|
Posts: 101 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#42
|
|
2009-01-09
, 07:33
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#43
|
|
2009-01-09
, 07:34
|
Posts: 179 |
Thanked: 1,679 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
@ Helsinki
|
#44
|
Peter's post does talk about choosing to accelerate Maemo's evolution by skipping Elephanta. It's not unreasonable to try and pin him down as to what this means in terms of the original "5 step" plan ;-)
|
2009-01-09
, 07:44
|
Posts: 253 |
Thanked: 104 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Midwest, USA
|
#45
|
|
2009-01-09
, 08:09
|
Posts: 99 |
Thanked: 17 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#46
|
It's okay to try to pin me down, but it's kind of difficult in an online forum, isn't it?! ;-)
Anyway, we don't have anything to announce on the Maemo 5 lead device right now. I understand that it would be important and fun to know more about the upcoming products but Nokia has a large business and launch dates are a complex issue. If you launch too early, you loose the excitement until the sales start. If you loose too early, you might cannibalize your existing product portfolio. If you launch too late then you don't give enough time for application and content developers to create content. If you launch too late, then you increase the risk for product leakages. If you launch too late, then you can't do wide-spread field testing with regular customers risking quality at sales start. And so on... The race is still on whether the Asus P565’s, the Palm Pre, or any Android MID will actually ship in a place near you before the lead device for Maemo 5.
|
2009-01-09
, 09:00
|
Posts: 132 |
Thanked: 30 times |
Joined on May 2007
@ Portugal
|
#47
|
It's okay to try to pin me down, but it's kind of difficult in an online forum, isn't it?! ;-)
Anyway, we don't have anything to announce on the Maemo 5 lead device right now. I understand that it would be important and fun to know more about the upcoming products but Nokia has a large business and launch dates are a complex issue. If you launch too early, you loose the excitement until the sales start. If you loose too early, you might cannibalize your existing product portfolio. If you launch too late then you don't give enough time for application and content developers to create content. If you launch too late, then you increase the risk for product leakages. If you launch too late, then you can't do wide-spread field testing with regular customers risking quality at sales start. And so on... The race is still on whether the Asus P565’s, the Palm Pre, or any Android MID will actually ship in a place near you before the lead device for Maemo 5.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to luso For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-01-09
, 09:50
|
|
Posts: 2,535 |
Thanked: 6,681 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ UK
|
#48
|
|
2009-01-09
, 10:43
|
Posts: 179 |
Thanked: 1,679 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
@ Helsinki
|
#49
|
Peter, you raise some good points, but if you look at the past history you see that time to market and price in the end is the key point. Often it is not the best product that succeeds (see beta vs VHS).
|
2009-01-09
, 10:43
|
Posts: 225 |
Thanked: 68 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
|
#50
|
Peter's post does talk about choosing to accelerate Maemo's evolution by skipping Elephanta. It's not unreasonable to try and pin him down as to what this means in terms of the original "5 step" plan ;-)
Tags |
blurry photos, fud, funny farm, haiku, hibernation, not the droids, picnic baskets, straightjacket, trollosaurus rex, what competition? |
|
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net