Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
christexaport's Avatar
Posts: 1,589 | Thanked: 720 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Arlington (DFW), Texas
#41
yeah, I was an idiot and an a..hat for saying many would want it, and it would add to the usefulness of the device, but now that the evidence is before them, they don't like hearing it. Well I didn't want to hear them earlier say it was useless, go back to Symbian, etc, so they're gonna hear it. no more mr. nice guy. effem
__________________
Maemo-Freak.com
"...and the Freaks shall inherit the Earth."
 
YoDude's Avatar
Posts: 2,869 | Thanked: 1,784 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Po' Bo'. PA
#42
Again, I was hoping that this thread would not get bogged down in a back and forth over individual features...

Since automatic screen rotation has been brought up I wanted to clear some things up:

1. AFAIK, ASR IS supported by the N900 but only for telephone functions.

2. I am neither for nor against it and only wish that the subject had not been injected in so many diverse threads by such a small percentage of this forum's active population.

3. The point of item #2 in no way indicates the % of this forum population that are either are for, against, indifferent, or just want a dang cheese samich.

It may simply mean that a large % percentage of this population have read the explanations, accepted the proposed roadmap for implementation, and moved on...


***

I have gathered up the responses and posted them here as a recap so that they may be copied, culled, and reposted in this thread and compared to what the N900 can actually do out of the box, as Beny1967 suggests.

If I missed someone’s suggestion it was not an intentional oversight and as more features come to mind just copy the list, add them, and then repost the list.

The list so far:


  • Ovi Maps
  • Quick Office
  • Integrated syncml client
  • Way bettter camera.
  • Printing support.
  • Easy phone calls
  • Easy contacts and dates management (no syncml)
  • OVI integration
  • Games
  • Easier photo or media sharing
  • Finding applications that aren't beta-(still) is easier
  • Web browsing on the N97 is better, much faster connection
  • Predictive text entry function and keyboard is better
  • Barcode scanner
  • Magnifying glass
  • OCR
  • Faster GPS aquisition
  • Ported apps for Google Mail, Maps, Youtube...
  • SyncML and a decent, syncable PIM suite !
  • No-fuss, natural SIP calls
  • Calcium (phone keypad calculator)
  • Sports Tracker
  • Nokia Maps
  • Default applications are solid and well integrated
  • J2ME
  • Large install base = more 3rd party apps
  • Universal ASR including desktop, dashboard, and widgets


… and as RipTorn suggests, if someone wants to eventually copy the list over to the WiKi so that it might serve as a proposed Road Map for the OS or as I envisioned, a list of potential opportunities for independent development, it won’t hurt my feelings none.

Someone with a prototype, SDK, or based on Nokia's released specs, could start by trimming "The List" and include the reasons why.

Last edited by YoDude; 2009-09-29 at 12:54.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to YoDude For This Useful Post:
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#43
Popularity is not an argument. Yes, Nokia E90 has portrait mode and T9, and just like a G1 portrait mode is the default mode. No wonder portrait mode is then more used. Can you see Nokia N900 does not have the required hardware to give a similar experience as Nokia E90? Can you see that Nokia N900 default mode is landscape and draw from the strength and weaknesses from this? For example, Dashboard makes it difficult to support full ASR. But we discussed that elsewhere already...

Originally Posted by Gorgon View Post
I don't understand the responses from some of the community in regards to this. Do you deny that there is a use case for portrait mode?
No, I do not deny that. The person I quoted keeps discussing this very issue in various threads ad nauseam. First of all, it is difficult to follow the same arguments/discussion scattered in several threads. Second, it is not productive.

One handed operation is key to productivity when one wants to check quick status of calendar, email, etc. and quickly respond to a message or reminder. Learning Linux isn't going to let me be able to manipulate the device any easier in landscape mode. And landscape mode is great for web browsing, gaming, typing email, remote admin, etc. but you can't deny that there's a portrait use case.
The point is, like lcuk said, to start from what we are and have, instead of comparing to an other device series and then saying we don't have that. My reply was not directed to you. Person I quoted and replied to has no experience with Maemo or Linux whatsoever therefore I suggested learning Linux until Nokia N900 and Maemo 5 are released. Learning Linux desktop will give the person a boost to exploit the strong points of Maemo.

In other words if you start using a new platform don't compare it with your current experience. Forget that, unlearn, and give the new platform a fair chance.

I'm an E71/N810 user as well. Being able to pull the device out to check messages, calendar events and to answer calls one handed is part of what makes the device great. Walking around having to use two hands all the time in landscape mode is not efficient or productive for short tasks.
Same here, and I can say you cannot always walk around with Nokia E71 while using it. Walking requires focus. Using a computer requires focus.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 
NvyUs's Avatar
Posts: 1,885 | Thanked: 2,008 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ OVI MAPS
#44
remove J2ME from the list b/c if its ever supported we'll never get new games developed using the 3D acceleration, we'll just end up with the rubbish J2ME apps made for s60, if only you knew how bad java games on it are.
it will hold back gaming innovation on maemo just like its done the same to s60, big mistake if it ever happens officially
even symbian foundation are questioning its relevance going forward, read the article they writ about java http://blog.symbian.org/2009/05/29/the-future-of-java/
 
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#45
Java ME (formerly known as J2ME) does a lot more than running games.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 
NvyUs's Avatar
Posts: 1,885 | Thanked: 2,008 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ OVI MAPS
#46
i know it does but games is what it gets primarily used for and all the big publishers use it and they suck so bad doing nothing innovative.

Last edited by NvyUs; 2009-09-29 at 17:48.
 
mece's Avatar
Posts: 1,111 | Thanked: 1,985 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Åbo, Finland
#47
Originally Posted by NvyUs View Post
i know it does but games is what it gets primarily used for and all the big publishers use it and they suck so bad doing nothing innovative.
I agree, but there are still some web services that require java, particularly some bank services and stuff. Java games should have a mandatory warning label.
 
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#48
Originally Posted by mece View Post
I agree, but there are still some web services that require java, particularly some bank services and stuff. Java games should have a mandatory warning label.
That is Java SE; not the same as Java ME. Wikipedia entry about Java
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 
YoDude's Avatar
Posts: 2,869 | Thanked: 1,784 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Po' Bo'. PA
#49
J2ME would require an emulator... Most J2ME apps that are out there now would require a d-pad or telephone keyboard for input I would think. In any event, a web run time could do more with less fuss.

Should Nokia's WRT also be on the list?
 
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#50
Originally Posted by nowave7 View Post
If they didn't intend the users to use the terminal, they should have left it out, like Android did, right?
On the other hand, it is true that most users are quite happy with the way things are now, and have no need to do anything with the terminal.
The terminal is not meant to be user friendly, it's just meant to get things done. Just like there's a terminal in Linux, OSX, and a command prompt in Windows. Under normal usage, most people don't have to interact with it.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:27.