![]() |
2009-11-13
, 14:58
|
|
Posts: 1,540 |
Thanked: 1,045 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
|
#42
|
The Following User Says Thank You to krisse For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-11-13
, 14:58
|
|
Posts: 1,885 |
Thanked: 2,008 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ OVI MAPS
|
#43
|
![]() |
2009-11-13
, 15:10
|
|
Posts: 850 |
Thanked: 626 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#44
|
Are you really, honestly saying that the most pro-consumer easy-to-remember name for this kind of device would be something like "n900"?
![]() |
2009-11-13
, 15:16
|
|
Posts: 1,436 |
Thanked: 3,144 times |
Joined on Jul 2005
|
#45
|
![]() |
2009-11-13
, 15:17
|
|
Posts: 332 |
Thanked: 76 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago
|
#46
|
![]() |
2009-11-13
, 15:26
|
Posts: 488 |
Thanked: 107 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Asgard / Midgard / London
|
#47
|
![]() |
2009-11-13
, 15:28
|
Posts: 488 |
Thanked: 107 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Asgard / Midgard / London
|
#48
|
I agree that a better name is easier to remember and will have more appeal.
I can still remember my first Nokia phones: the 6110, 6150, and 3210, and some of the newer ones like the E61, N95 and E71, but for some reason, I can't remember the ones in between. For those who never owned these phones, when I say '6110' you won't even know how it looks. However, when I say 'Treo', iPhone', or 'RAZR', even though each phone has several models, you automatically get an image of how the phone looks.
![]() |
2009-11-13
, 16:33
|
|
Posts: 2,669 |
Thanked: 2,555 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
|
#49
|
The Following User Says Thank You to zerojay For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-11-13
, 16:46
|
|
Posts: 2,173 |
Thanked: 2,678 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Cornwall, UK
|
#50
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RevdKathy For This Useful Post: | ||
You think that's the best that can be done?