|
2009-11-28
, 00:59
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#42
|
|
2009-11-28
, 01:08
|
|
Posts: 445 |
Thanked: 572 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Oxford
|
#43
|
But this seems to be what commercial Linux distributions do, so it's no surprise.
|
2009-11-28
, 01:13
|
|
Posts: 2,669 |
Thanked: 2,555 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
|
#44
|
|
2009-11-28
, 01:14
|
Posts: 474 |
Thanked: 283 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Oxford, UK
|
#45
|
|
2009-11-28
, 01:17
|
|
Posts: 445 |
Thanked: 572 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Oxford
|
#46
|
|
2009-11-28
, 02:13
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#47
|
This could suck even more for Android, since the OS is designed to allow removal of apps that they deem to be "dangerous" to the network.
This situation will be good to see if Android actually fires the weapon if pushed on it. There are still ways around it, but the market could be impacted and the one very rare good point about the Android market will be shot to 5hit.
|
2009-11-28
, 03:19
|
|
Posts: 1,107 |
Thanked: 720 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Germany
|
#48
|
|
2009-11-28
, 03:34
|
|
Posts: 610 |
Thanked: 391 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
@ DC, USA
|
#49
|
|
2009-11-28
, 03:50
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#50
|
But could forcefully remove apps if the person was running custom firmware?
It'll be an ugly situation if we have to have another repository (or multiple ones) for free software that maemo.org cannot host, and the other repository is not easy to reach through the regular Maemo GUI.
But this seems to be what commercial Linux distributions do, so it's no surprise.
Btw, have a pleasant weekend, zerojay and everyone else