Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 67 | Thanked: 28 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Switzerland
#41
Originally Posted by mikec View Post
That photo looks very uncharacteristic of N900 photos taken in daylight. I noticed the directory is 08 2009, was this a very early sample?
I've seen a couple of photos that look like this on the net. However, it may well be that those have all been taken by preproduction devices, I don't know. I just remember being not so impressed by the quality when I first saw some samples a couple of weeks ago.
 
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#42
Originally Posted by archzai View Post
thats hardly a request that the general public deems a priority.
sorry.
Please check out threads http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?p=328657 and http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=29907&page=4 to be up to date on the question of basic expected functionality.
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc
 
Posts: 5 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#43
Originally Posted by archzai View Post
Just wondering.

All I see is people telling others to post bug reports. But there are so many reports.

Has anyone actually gotten a reply regarding a bug they posted? Or has anyone from the Maemo team actually responded to a bug report saying they will address it? I have this sinking feeling the website is just a giant black hole to keep people quiet while resources are put into Maemo 6

I was going to wait till Maemo 6 was released, but I took the plunge anyway. So, the question now is...will we be able to upgrade to Maemo 6 software on our N900's? Or will we have to buy the new N950's or N1000 or whatever it is?
 
skalogre's Avatar
Posts: 327 | Thanked: 249 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Λεμεσιανός, ρε!
#44
Originally Posted by nokialova View Post
I was going to wait till Maemo 6 was released, but I took the plunge anyway. So, the question now is...will we be able to upgrade to Maemo 6 software on our N900's? Or will we have to buy the new N950's or N1000 or whatever it is?
Maybe. Until 6 is out we will not know for sure imho.
 
ewan's Avatar
Posts: 445 | Thanked: 572 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Oxford
#45
These debates about whether it's possible to release updates in small pieces when they're ready, or whether it's possible to do development in the open or not always seem very odd when there are a good number of existing desktop Linux systems, considerably more complex than Maemo, that manage to do this as a matter of routine.

It works, we know it does, because we're already doing it.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ewan For This Useful Post:
Andre Klapper's Avatar
Posts: 1,665 | Thanked: 1,649 times | Joined on Jun 2008 @ Praha, Czech Republic
#46
Originally Posted by ewan View Post
These debates about whether it's possible to release updates in small pieces when they're ready, or whether it's possible to do development in the open or not always seem very odd when there are a good number of existing desktop Linux systems, considerably more complex than Maemo, that manage to do this as a matter of routine.

It works, we know it does, because we're already doing it.
Also see the comments in https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5709 and the corresponding Brainstorm ticket.
__________________
maemo.org Bugmaster
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Andre Klapper For This Useful Post:
qgil's Avatar
Posts: 3,105 | Thanked: 11,088 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ Mountain View (CA, USA)
#47
About the initial question of this thread, a couple of links that you might or might not find interesting

http://maemo.org/profile/list/catego...illa_reported/
http://maemo.org/profile/list/catego...illa_comments/

And perhaps more interesting, it must be possible to extract Maemo 5 bugs filed since October 9 (the day Summit participants got devices to test) that have been resolved as fixed, and probably even more accurate stats of bugs filed on the sales release that have been addressed already. There is quite a lot of information at http://bugs.maemo.org and anybody can extract it doing some clever searches.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to qgil For This Useful Post:
skalogre's Avatar
Posts: 327 | Thanked: 249 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Λεμεσιανός, ρε!
#48
Originally Posted by qgil View Post
About the initial question of this thread, a couple of links that you might or might not find interesting

http://maemo.org/profile/list/catego...illa_reported/
http://maemo.org/profile/list/catego...illa_comments/

And perhaps more interesting, it must be possible to extract Maemo 5 bugs filed since October 9 (the day Summit participants got devices to test) that have been resolved as fixed, and probably even more accurate stats of bugs filed on the sales release that have been addressed already. There is quite a lot of information at http://bugs.maemo.org and anybody can extract it doing some clever searches.
Something like this should be stickied, seriously. Thanks qgil
 
Posts: 61 | Thanked: 9 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ San Diego
#49
If I'm not wrong there is only 80 bugs fixed so far. Could that be right?

https://bugs.maemo.org/buglist.cgi?q...op&value0-0-0=
 
Posts: 87 | Thanked: 88 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Beijing
#50
OK, here's a question: if we do end up OTA fixing bugs automatically on the go, how do we communicate what's been fixed?

Honestly, the average consumer (and quite a few of them have the device), will probably not want to search for bug fixes all the time so they're likely to not bother finding fixes to what's bugging them (pun intended). But if you do it automatically then they'd probably like to know that their email clients now work perfectly etc.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:05.