The Following User Says Thank You to johnel For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-01-26
, 13:33
|
Posts: 229 |
Thanked: 36 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Bulgaria
|
#43
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jorjino For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-01-26
, 13:36
|
Posts: 229 |
Thanked: 36 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Bulgaria
|
#44
|
There is no way I will buying the next maemo-based phone if it was released this year!
I spent £500 when I bought the n900 in December 2009.
There is no way I'll be gullible enough to think "oooohhh - new maemo phone this year - I must buy it" and spend another £500 a new phone.
£1000 spent in a year - on mobile phones?
No thanks I'll wait minimum 18 months to a couple of years before I think about that.
However, if Nokia brought a new form-factor - e.g. no keyboard, slimmer and higher spec camera. Then fair enough create a device for wider appeal - attract new users.
I won't buy one just yet - maybe in a couple of years.
If Nokia release a new maemo version and make it painful to port maemo5 based apps to it then it will be an "Epc fail" and people will jump to Android or new iPhone.
I'm hoping common sense will prevail and Nokia will produce a new form factor with an updated maemo-based device.
If Nokia had any sense they would ensure theat maemo 5 apps can run on maemo 6 and grow the application pool.
Also backport some of the changes to maemo 6 to maemo 5 or a full upgrade.
This will help devlopers write software that can run on both versions of the os.
Ideally you write your apps on "updated" or QT-enabled n900 (even n8xx too) - it runs fine on maemo 5 and maemo 6 users can run it on thier devices too. Just by using a single binary.
Over time the volume of usable applications increases making the platform more desirable.
Sure maemo 6 can be QT-based and include refinements to the os - that's fine but if it means incompatibility then Nokia are wasting thier time and will continue to lose market share and we will start losing interest.
The Following User Says Thank You to jorjino For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-01-26
, 14:04
|
Posts: 119 |
Thanked: 124 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Brazil
|
#45
|
![]() |
2010-01-26
, 14:05
|
Posts: 968 |
Thanked: 974 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
@ Ohio
|
#46
|
![]() |
2010-01-26
, 14:14
|
Posts: 51 |
Thanked: 22 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#47
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ericj23 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-01-26
, 15:25
|
Posts: 323 |
Thanked: 76 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#48
|
![]() |
2010-01-26
, 15:30
|
Posts: 374 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Hungary
|
#49
|
I spent £500 when I bought the n900 in December 2009.
There is no way I'll be gullible enough to think "oooohhh - new maemo phone this year - I must buy it" and spend another £500 a new phone.
£1000 spent in a year - on mobile phones?
No thanks I'll wait minimum 18 months to a couple of years before I think about that.
However, if Nokia brought a new form-factor - e.g. no keyboard, slimmer and higher spec camera. Then fair enough create a device for wider appeal - attract new users.
I won't buy one just yet - maybe in a couple of years.
If Nokia release a new maemo version and make it painful to port maemo5 based apps to it then it will be an "Epc fail" and people will jump to Android or new iPhone.
I'm hoping common sense will prevail and Nokia will produce a new form factor with an updated maemo-based device.
If Nokia had any sense they would ensure theat maemo 5 apps can run on maemo 6 and grow the application pool.
Also backport some of the changes to maemo 6 to maemo 5 or a full upgrade.
This will help devlopers write software that can run on both versions of the os.
Ideally you write your apps on "updated" or QT-enabled n900 (even n8xx too) - it runs fine on maemo 5 and maemo 6 users can run it on thier devices too. Just by using a single binary.
Over time the volume of usable applications increases making the platform more desirable.
Sure maemo 6 can be QT-based and include refinements to the os - that's fine but if it means incompatibility then Nokia are wasting thier time and will continue to lose market share and we will start losing interest.
I like cake.