![]() |
2010-02-04
, 18:01
|
Posts: 308 |
Thanked: 118 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ UK Swindon
|
#42
|
![]() |
2010-02-04
, 18:02
|
|
Posts: 305 |
Thanked: 71 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ 'Nam
|
#43
|
![]() |
2010-02-04
, 18:02
|
Posts: 127 |
Thanked: 44 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Nottingham
|
#44
|
![]() |
2010-02-04
, 18:05
|
|
Posts: 1,656 |
Thanked: 1,196 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ Alabama, USA
|
#45
|
![]() |
2010-02-04
, 19:08
|
Posts: 308 |
Thanked: 118 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ UK Swindon
|
#46
|
No for me, still with Orange in the UK.
I am curious as to why those from the UK would not go for Orange if they weren't buying on contract. When I last checked coverage maps, Orange covered far more of the country with 3/3.5 G.
![]() |
2010-02-04
, 19:21
|
|
Posts: 861 |
Thanked: 734 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Nomadic
|
#47
|
![]() |
2010-02-04
, 22:25
|
Posts: 63 |
Thanked: 25 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#48
|
Honestly, I couldn't care less which carrier I have (as long as I don't get ripped off either price wise or connection wise; both cases seem to not be rare nowdays though).
Let's say you're going to buy a console (which might not be the best comparison here). Then, do you rather want to choose the only non-prefered model that happens to be availible in a store near you, or do you simply get the machine of your choise somewhere else?