The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frappacino For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-19
, 20:19
|
|
Posts: 2,853 |
Thanked: 968 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#42
|
I've seen this a few times and let me say this:
How many have tried it? I mean.. this community is being severely impacted by another OS.. even going it's route for a packaging system.. and probably likely to use more of it's structure or base than Maemo's... just keeping Maemo's QT..
So how many of you have taken a look?
|
2010-02-19
, 20:22
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#43
|
Just for the record, in the post you're answering there, I didn't mean to say that Moblin itself was something bad or good. Just that I had never seen it natively shipped on brand-name, globally available hardware like Maemo has been since 2005. This was just for the sake of disputing Kathy's "functioning perfectly well without a forum" jibe about the Moblin "community".
And yes, I've tried it on my netbook too, but had hardware support problems, and didn't like the UI, so I finally went with Mint. But maybe we just share that thing about "bubbly" :-)
The Following User Says Thank You to fatalsaint For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-19
, 20:51
|
Posts: 352 |
Thanked: 231 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Vancouver
|
#44
|
|
2010-02-19
, 21:13
|
|
Posts: 2,853 |
Thanked: 968 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#45
|
Ah. I didn't experience any hardware issues that I've noticed yet.. but also haven't done much with it either. Just some browsing and video playback to try out the new toy.
I still maintain that Moblin not being available on anything doesn't really mean anything.. about the community or about the OS. It simply means no hardware platform has picked it up.
I'm sure the Moblin community thought they ran perfectly fine before all this mess . They are probably over there wondering how we manage to have a community with how these forums have looked lately .
The Following User Says Thank You to fpp For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-19
, 21:16
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#46
|
|
2010-02-19
, 21:41
|
|
Posts: 2,853 |
Thanked: 968 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#47
|
|
2010-02-19
, 21:54
|
Posts: 17 |
Thanked: 14 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#48
|
gerbick is correct
what mapkes it worse is nokia's fancy dodging. just say yes or no. n900 customers are not stupid and will understand - e.g. if it is a "no" because of hardware limitations, well, so be it.
|
2010-02-20
, 09:12
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#49
|
- restricting little hacks like adding brightness controller to the phone menu or making an app that pauses media player when you pull the headphones out.
with MeeGo is Nokia and Intel may not leave those types of conflicts open to the community to solve, but they would take an active role in securing there commercial interest at the expense of the progress the community would bring.
The Following User Says Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-20
, 10:52
|
Posts: 8 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#50
|
I strongly suspect that they haven't said because they don't know... It's still early days yet, and obviously the primary goal of meego is for future handsets, but there's definitely value to Nokia in bringing meego to the n900 - so the evaluation they will be making is what the cost of that effort is relative to the value.
If I was product managing this, I certainly wouldn't commit to officially supporting meego on the n900 until I was quite certain that the cost of the port would be less than the value to Nokia... I suspect it'll take some time to sort that out.
I'm eady said they'll port meego to the n900 if there isn't an 'officistill not exactly sure what the ruckus is about - haven't the 'mer' folks alral' version??
The Following User Says Thank You to swineflue For This Useful Post: | ||
what mapkes it worse is nokia's fancy dodging. just say yes or no. n900 customers are not stupid and will understand - e.g. if it is a "no" because of hardware limitations, well, so be it.
many have seen companies do their fancy verbal dodging before, what it usually means is that the company knows the answer, but refuse to give it because they think it will hurt sales. but customers are not stupid, so customers see this behaviour and automatically assume the worse (which is usually correct), and it feeds off itself.
regardless, i think if nokia DID have plans to have meego on n900, they would have announced it with meego. the fact that this wasnt done and the constant emphasis on app backward compatibility from meego on n900 pretty much seals the deal for me stating that there will be no official meego for n900
other's opinoin may vary, but i just shake my head and teh corporate stupidity being shown here.