Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
luca's Avatar
Posts: 1,137 | Thanked: 402 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Catalunya
#41
Originally Posted by lcuk View Post
One of the principle things I have said over the time I have been here is that I do not mind closed source code as long as it is actively maintained.
The problem is that closed source code isn't actively maintained when it no longer makes commercial sense to do so (read: n8x0 roughly a year/a year and a half ago and now n900)

Originally Posted by lcuk View Post
I do however understand that certain pieces of code will never be open, so on that basis would hope to continue to push the internal teams to offering important security fixes as they arise.
Call me when there's, e.g., an updated flash version for my n800 that fixes its outstanding security issues.

Originally Posted by lcuk View Post
I do not want to just open the code and let it rot though.
Oh, sure it's much better not to open it at all and giving us nice speeches about openness instead.

Originally Posted by lcuk View Post
It would be even better if the community improvements and advancements could be integrated into further "service packs" so that we gain the best of the best.
The community SSU created for the n810 shows that this can in practice work.
Mmh, let me check:

Code:
$ uname -a
Linux noname 2.6.21-omap1 #2 Sun Apr 25 17:02:47 BST 2010 armv6l unknown
No, it doesn't.
__________________
Don't buy LG TV sets (click for details).
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to luca For This Useful Post:
luca's Avatar
Posts: 1,137 | Thanked: 402 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Catalunya
#42
Originally Posted by luca View Post
Mmh, let me check:

Code:
$ uname -a
Linux noname 2.6.21-omap1 #2 Sun Apr 25 17:02:47 BST 2010 armv6l unknown
No, it doesn't.
I want to make clear that this last remark is not directed at the community ssu team: they did a wonderful job, even more so considering the limitations they had to work with.
__________________
Don't buy LG TV sets (click for details).
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to luca For This Useful Post:
qgil's Avatar
Posts: 3,105 | Thanked: 11,088 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ Mountain View (CA, USA)
#43
Guys, I understand your argumentation since the first time it was explained. No need to revolve further, really.

I have also explained the current openness strategy of the MeeGo Devices team, focused on MeeGo. You have also understood it and I won't insist on it.

The openness priorities of MeeGo Devices don't mach with the openness expectations of those interested in Maemo here and now. We are aware of this and we had this discussion held internally once during the last half, when analysing the situation after the MeeGo launch. Based on this discussion I will explain the current situation to the people responsible of the business decisions of opening Nokia software.

If there is a change in the approach for opening current Maemo components, then let's talk about the community's work to request and handle the software opened.
 

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to qgil For This Useful Post:
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#44
Originally Posted by qgil View Post
Guys, I understand your argumentation since the first time it was explained. No need to revolve further, really.

I have also explained the current openness strategy of the MeeGo Devices team, focused on MeeGo. You have also understood it and I won't insist on it.

The openness priorities of MeeGo Devices don't mach with the openness expectations of those interested in Maemo here and now. We are aware of this and we had this discussion held internally once during the last half, when analysing the situation after the MeeGo launch. Based on this discussion I will explain the current situation to the people responsible of the business decisions of opening Nokia software.

If there is a change in the approach for opening current Maemo components, then let's talk about the community's work to request and handle the software opened.
Maybe it's just me, or maybe I still need some coffee today or something but I read, and re-read, what you said and it still keeps disappearing in a puff of smoke for me as a lot of words with a zero-sum difference at the end.

Speak layman's terms to me and summarize, what do you mean?
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,224 | Thanked: 1,763 times | Joined on Jul 2007
#45
Yet again:
Originally Posted by qgil View Post
...
MeeGo
...
MeeGo
...
MeeGo
...
I wish that the new rules include MeeGo as a forbidden word in the Maemo section of this forum.
__________________
My repository

"N900 community support for the MeeGo-Harmattan" Is the new "Mer is Fremantle for N810".

No more Nokia devices for me.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Matan For This Useful Post:
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#46
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
Maybe it's just me, or maybe I still need some coffee today or something but I read, and re-read, what you said and it still keeps disappearing in a puff of smoke for me as a lot of words with a zero-sum difference at the end.

Speak layman's terms to me and summarize, what do you mean?
My interpretation: Quim will revisit this subject again with Nokia movers and shakers, and if there's a change in approach/policy to our favor, he will inform the community and we can then discuss how best to proceed.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#47
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
My interpretation: Quim will revisit this subject again with Nokia movers and shakers, and if there's a change in approach/policy to our favor, he will inform the community and we can then discuss how best to proceed.
So.... status quo. Well, on the up side, at least he's doing it again. And again. And again.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post:
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#48
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
So.... status quo. Well, on the up side, at least he's doing it again. And again. And again.
You know the drill well!
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#49
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
You know the drill well!
Years of observation and practice.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,258 | Thanked: 672 times | Joined on Mar 2009
#50
Originally Posted by Tomaszd View Post
3D graphics or battery charging, because that's the only two things left from what I understand. The rest will be opened, many people are working on this. That's fine and I'm happy about that..
As for battery charging on the N900, the hardware components involved have full datasheets availabe. I can monitor the charge level, and charge the battery without using the closed bme. It took me about two weekends to write that in busybox sh script plus a helper binary from i2c-tools for the actual hw access. Obviously a shell script in two x-terminals that requires user intervention to start charging is nowhere user ready, but I don't have the spare time to rewrite it into anything proper..

The components involved are bq24150, bq27200, and the usb parts.
 

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to shadowjk For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:18.