The Following User Says Thank You to ivanzorkic For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-05-20
, 23:04
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#42
|
|
2010-05-20
, 23:12
|
Posts: 303 |
Thanked: 175 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ London UK
|
#43
|
|
2010-05-20
, 23:25
|
Posts: 3,401 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ London, UK
|
#44
|
|
2010-05-20
, 23:42
|
Posts: 303 |
Thanked: 175 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ London UK
|
#45
|
|
2010-05-20
, 23:53
|
Posts: 1,097 |
Thanked: 650 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#46
|
|
2010-05-21
, 00:01
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#47
|
On some days, it's small things like this that reconfirm that Maemo just is really no bigger than this forum.
|
2010-05-21
, 00:11
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#49
|
The Following User Says Thank You to geneven For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-05-21
, 00:14
|
Posts: 550 |
Thanked: 110 times |
Joined on Aug 2006
|
#50
|
I would also like to know, if we don't get Flash 10.1, who is to blame - Nokia or Adobe. And what are the reasons.
If there is a good reason, fine. Even if it's a business decision - I can live with it. But what I won't be fine with is if we don't get any explanation from Nokia. They owe us at least that. No, there was no false marketing. But there were realistic expectations and they should show good will and go out in public with a reason - whatever it may be.